SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 issue2Evaluation of the short and long estrus synchronization protocol in inseminated sheep with frozen semenGinger supplementation in quail as a nutritional alternative in egg production and quality author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Journal of the Selva Andina Animal Science

Print version ISSN 2311-3766On-line version ISSN 2311-2581

J.Selva Andina Anim. Sci. vol.8 no.2 La Paz  2021

https://doi.org/10.36610/j.jsaas.2021.080200082 

Short Communication

Eimeria control in baby alpacas using toltrazuril as a prophylactic measure in hu-mid Puna

Diana Sánchez-Herencia1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-5354

Guiulfo Mamani-Mango1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8109-7702

Pedro Coila-Añasco2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5708-7464

1 Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Escuela Profesional de Medicina Veterinaria Sede Sicuani. Av. La Cultura 733, Cusco, Perú.

2 Universidad Nacional del Altiplano-Puno. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Av. Floral 1153, Puno, Perú Tel: +051-599430


Resumen

Con los objetivos de determinar la eficacia del toltrazuril como profilácticas sobre el control de eimerias y determinar la dosis profiláctica frente a las especies de eimerias en crías de alpacas situadas en puna húmeda, se realizó un estudio en el Centro de Investigación de Camélidos Sudamericanos La Raya Cusco Perú, se identificó 50 crías de alpaca de 3 a 4 meses de edad distribuidas en 5 grupos de 10 animales cada uno: G1 tratadas con 15 mg/kg de peso vivo (PV) de toltrazuril por vía oral (VO), G2 con 18.7 mg/kg PV/VO, G3 con 22.5 mg/kg, G4 con 30 mg/kg y G5 sin dosificación alguna (grupo control). Se realizó el análisis coproparasitológico antes de dosificar (día 0) y a los siete días post-tratamiento. El análisis se realizó por el método de MacMaster modificado. Los datos se sometieron a análisis de varianza y a la prueba de Fisher. Los resultados señalan que utilizando 15 mg/kg PV y 18.7 mg/kg PV de toltrazuril se controla solamente especies pequeñas como Eimeria punoensis E. alpacae y E. lamae, mas no la especie grande (E. macusaniensis) y con 22.5 y 30 mg/kg PV además de controlar especies pequeñas también se reducen significativamente la eliminación de ooquistes de E. macusaniensis (p≤0.05). Se concluye que la dosis profiláctica para controlar eimerias en crías de alpacas fue de 22.5 y 30 mg/kg PV, con una sola aplicación por vía oral, logra controlar las cuatro especies registradas en este trabajo.

Palabras clave: Alpaca; control; dosis; eimeria; profilaxis; toltrazuril

Abstract

An effective concentration of toltrazuril to prophylactics in the control of eimerias and determine the prophylactic dose against eimerias species was evaluated in cria alpacas of the La Raya research center in Cusco Peru. Fifty cria alpacas of 3-4 months of age. distributed in 5 groups of 10 animals each: G1 treated with 15 mg/kg of live weight (LW) of toltrazuril orally (VO), G2 with 18.7 mg/kg BW/PO, G3 with 22.5 mg/kg, G4 with 30 mg/kg and G5 without any dosage (control group). All dosage was given orally. Fecal analysis was performed using the modified McMaster technique at time 0 ad seven days later. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and a Fisher test was done to determine statistical significance. The results indicate that using toltrazuril 15 mg/kg BW and 18.7 mg/kg BW, only small species such as Eimeria punoensis E. alpacae and E. lamae are controlled, but not the large species (E. macusaniensis) and with 22.5 and 30 mg/kg LW, in addition to controlling small species, the elimination of E. macusaniensis oocysts is also significantly reduced (p≤0.05). It is concluded that the prophylactic doses to control eimerias in baby alpacas is 22.5 and 30 mg/kg BW, with a single oral application, which manages to control the four species registered in this work.

Keywords: Alpaca; control; eimeria; dose; prophylaxis; toltrazuril

Introduction

Alpacas are naturally distributed between 3600-5400 meters’ altitude. In South America, more than a million small producers have alpacas and llamas, as their main means of subsistence; these animals provide meat, milk, fiber, transport energy, fertilizer, and they are also an important element of their cultural identity of the high Andean1,2.

Parasitism becomes a common threat to the health and productivity of alpacas3, they have had a direct impact on the economic income of farmers, some protozoa the genus Eimeria, these have affected the health of neonates, young alpacas from 2-3 weeks of age, causing the latter up to 80 % diarrhea4, death 43.3 % of offspring between 1 to 2 months of age5. Among the species are small eimerias such as Eimeria punoensis, E. alpacae and E. lamae6, large eimerias, such as E. macusaniensis, E. ivitaensis were also described, especially the former alone or associated with E. lamae or E. ivitaensis are considered highly pathogenic, E. macusaniensis being found in diarrheal processes that cause serious intestinal lesions in alpacas7.

To avoid the consequences of eimeriosis, prevention is important, through management and hygiene, accompanied by the prophylactic use of like sulfonamides, ionophores, amprolium, halofuginone, toltrazuril, nicarbazine8. Dubey et al.9 They mention that the efficacy of several drugs to treat clinical coccidiosis is unknown. And that no anticoccidial has a measurable effect on the late stages of gamontes and oocysts that have been commonly related to clinical coccidiosis associated with E. macusaniensis and E. ivitaensis. However, the use of preventive drugs was studied in alpacas such as decoquinate at 0.5 mg/kg LW for 28 days and amprolium at 5 mg/kg LW for 21 days in alpacas10. Toltrazuril was also used at low doses, as it is a drug that it acts on all intracellular

stages of the parasite11. Similarly, Ballweber10 performed treatments with 15 to 20 mg/kg LW of toltrazuril in alpacas, the response to the use of toltrazuril for other animal species is efficient, thus. In goats it is induced the complete elimination of eimerias oocysts 7 days after treatment with a single dose of 20 mg/kg LW11. In calves an anticoccidial response is also reported with 15 mg/kg LW12 and 20 mg/kg LW of toltrazuril13. The same occurs in sheep at 20 mg/kg LW14. Because, toltrazuril acts against all intracellular development stages of coccidia, this drug interfering in the division of the nucleus, the activity of mitochondria and wall-forming bodies in microgametes, to result in the death of the organism15,16 cataloged as a promising drug for the control of eimerias in different animal species.

Considering the antecedents described, the study was designed with the aim to determine the efficacy of toltrazuril as a prophylactic for the control of eimerias, to determine the prophylactic dose against eimerias species in baby alpacas in humid puna, because it has not yet. Reference data have reported effective doses of toltrazuril on the control of eimerias. And whose results will be useful in the prevention of coccidiosis.

Materials and methods

Place of study. The study has developed long the month of May 2017, at the South American Camelidae Research Center (CICAS) La Raya of the National University of San Antonio Abad del Cusco (UNSAAC) located at 4130 altitude meters. Located in Marangani, Cusco-Peru.

Animals. In this study. Has been used 50 baby Huacaya alpaca of 3 to 4 months. They had an average live weight (LW) of 10 kg. The animals were in apparent good clinical condition, all the animals belong to the CICAS “La Raya".

Figure 1 Oral application of toltrazuril 

The 50 offspring have randomly distributed into 5 groups (4 treatments and 1 control). Each group had 10 animals. They have based on the doses of toltrazuril (mg/kg LW) administered orally (AO) (Figure 1). Group 1 G1 were administered 15 mg/kg PV, group 2 G2 18 mg/kg LW, group 3 G3 22.5 mg/kg LW, group 4 G4 30 mg/kg PV and group 5 G5 control group without application of any placebo, but subjected to the same manipulation for the collection of samples. After the application of the drug, all the animals remained under the same management and feeding conditions, consuming native pastures of CICAS La Raya. The 15 mg dose recommended by the manufacturer of the drug (Tolcocx®) and the higher doses by experiences carried out by other authors17 and by previous experiments.

The drug. Tolcocx®, Laboratorios Biomont Perú, with a chemical base of toltrazuril at 50 mg/mL, production date 07-2015, batch 074095. We assume this dose because there is not data about this use in the treatment of coccidiosis in camelids10.

Collection of samples. The collection of fecal samples has made directly the rectal ampulla between 6 and 7 hour of day. This have done before to herding, consecutive to the administration of the drug (Figure 2). Samples were put into labeled polyethylene bags. This samples without the use of preservatives, their transfer was immediate for subsequent analysis on the same day of collection. Samples were obtained prior to treatment (day 0), to determine the initial burden of eimerias. And the effect of toltrazuril doses was corroborated, 7 days after treatment.

Figure 2 Collection of fecal samples 

Sample analysis. The coproparasitological analysis was carried out in the Parasitology Laboratory of the School of Veterinary Medicine, Canchis Headquarters of the UNSAAC. To determine the amount of eimerias, the oocyst count per gram of stool (OPG) was performed, using the modified MacMaster technique using Sheather's solution and applying the correction factor of 10018,19.

Statistical analysis. Average and standard error of the mean were used to describe the quantitative OPG data of eimerias. While to determine the effect of toltrazuril doses in the control of small eimerias (E. punoensis, E. alpacae, E. lamae) and large eimeria (E. macusaniensis), the data were subjected to an analysis of variance. To discriminate the mean difference between treatment groups, Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) was performed. For the statistical analysis, the statistical package Statgraphics Centurion version 1820 was used.

Results

The effectiveness of toltrazuril doses on the oocyst amount of small and large eimerias in baby alpacas, these is illustrated in Table 1. It is observed that the amount of oocysts in both small and large eimerias before treatment (day 0) was similar (p> 0.05). At 7 days of treatment, the small eimerias (E. punoensis, E. alpacae, E. lamae) with doses of 15 mg/kg LW maintain a population similar to the control group (p> 0.05). While when applying 18.7 and 22.5 mg/kg LW the amount of oocysts decreased, being the value of 0 OPG with the dose of 30 mg/kg LW (p≤0.05). Regarding large eimeria (E. macusaniensis) at 7 days it is evidenced that there was a significant reduction in OPG with doses between 22.5 mg / kg LW and 30 mg / kg LW (P≤0.05).

Table 1 Effectiveness of toltrazuril doses on the oocyst count of small eimerias and large eimeria (mean±SE) in baby alpacas 

Groups n Toltrazuril dose mg / kg LW OPG Small eimeria OPG Large eimeria
Pre-treatment Post-treatment Pre-treatment Post-treatment
Day 0 Day 7 Day 0 Day 7
G1 10 15.0 5520±1721 4680c ± 1767 3620±1633 3080b ± 1559
G2 10 18.7 5280±2231 3050b ± 2274 3950±2444 2810b ± 2376
G3 10 22.5 8570±3401 1200ab ± 875 5710±3071 1200a ± 875
G4 10 30.0 7720±3267 0a ± 0 2130 ±1310 0a ± 0
G5 10 Control 4970±2345 5110c ± 1325 3390±2386 2710b ± 1105

Table 2 Presence of eimerias species, in oocysts per gram of feces (OPG), in baby alpacas before and after treatment according to toltrazuril dose 

Especies Before treatment (OPG) After treatment (OPG)
Average Toltrazuril dosage (mg/kg PV) Control
15 18.7 22.5 30
Small eimerias          
E. punoensis 1936 460 240 0 0 1330
E. alpacae 60 460 0 0 0 0
E. lamae 652 755.56 0 0 0 800
Big eimeria
E. macusaniensis 3760 3080 2810 1200 0 2800
Summation 6408 4755.56 3050 1200 0 4930

The presence of eimerias species, in alpaca offspring before and after treatment according to toltrazuril dose are presented in Table 2. It is evidenced that of the total of baby alpaca examined prior to treatment, 94 % were parasitized (47/50), with an average of 6408 OPG of Eimerias spp. With a more predominance of E. macusaniensis than rest (P≤0.05). And the presence of oocysts of E. ivitaensis was not evidenced.

The efficacy of toltrazuril on the species of eimerias, in Table 2. It was observed that when orally administering 15 mg/kg LW of toltrazuril, the oocysts of E. punoensis are in lower quantity than control group, but the species of E. alpacae, E. lamae and E. macusaniensis are not affected. Considering an insufficient dose for their control. By applying 18.7 mg, the number of oocysts is reduced in all species, but the high number of 2810 oocysts of E. macusaniensis is still maintained. The effect of 22.5 mg/kg PV reduces the presence of small eimeria oocysts to zero. However, E. macusaniensis is present with 1200 OPG, an amount that is reduced to zero by providing 30 mg/kg PV, which is similar in the rest of the species.

Discussion

The efficiency of the toltrazuril dose to the control eimerias in baby alpacas, is observed in Table 1, 15 mg/kg LW. There was not reduction in the amount of oocysts. These is referring to what was observed in the control group. Despite the fact that Ballwever10 reports this amount as a preventive dose for cattle, as well as the manufacturer suggests it for cattle (Tolcocx®, Laboratorios Biomont Perú). The difference in its effect on alpacas, because it is another species. That is due to the different physiological mechanisms that arise in each animal species21.

Related to effect on small eimerias. Doses of 18.7 and 22.2 mg/kg LW produce more reduction in oocysts than control group. Same to 20 mg/kg, dose was recommended to pigs for Ballweber10. Also, Sánchez et al.13 to cattle. And for goats Iqbal et al.11 Meanwhile. To control large eimerias like E. macusaniensis, dose of 18.7 mg/kg LW was insufficient. Possibly due to the resistance of its thick wall22 face several chemical agents17. But, with 22.2 and 30 mg/kg LW it is possible to control large eimerias, which are considered the most pathogenic for alpaca babys23.

With reference to the effect of the drug among eimerias species, 94 % (47/50) of alpaca offspring have the presence of some eimeria species, a higher percentage than that reported by Salazar Robayo24, Camareno et al.25 and Kultscher et al.26 who mention values of 70.7, 52.4 and 75.1 %, respectively, which is probably due to the fact that these authors worked with older animals. Before treatment, the average the four species of eimerias found in baby alpacas was 6408 OPG, a figure higher than that reported by Quina Quina27 who reported 3883 OPG of eimerias in 3-month-old alpacas, a difference that we attribute to the inclusion in their work in adult animals, the presence of eimerias is lower than those found in offspring28.

The preponderant eimerias are E. macusaniensis and E. punoensis that are found in 78 % (30/50) and 58 % (29/50) in the offspring before treatment, similar to Diaz2 who report that E. macusaniensis is superior to the rest of species, in 38 % of three-month-old offspring, on the other hand Salazar Robayo & Galecio24 mention 29.3 % in 5-month-old and adult alpacas as carriers, with respect to the amount Quina Quina27 they found a maximum peak of 1304 OPG of E. macusaniensis. For their part, Camareno et al.25 reported the prevalence of E. macusaniensis in alpacas from 5 to 12 months in relation to the rest of the species (P≤0.05) and among small species, 66.2 % E. punoensis, the same way Díaz et al.2 found 78 % of offspring infected with E. punoensis.

It is important to distinguish the species of parasites, because they can be simultaneously infecting a host, and vary in pathogenicity in their biology29, so we take as a reference for pathogenicity E. macusaniensis. This specie causes moderate to severe lesions in the gut alpaca and can kill them with signs diarrhea23. The findings indicate that doses lower than 22 mg/kg LW were necessary to reduce of oocysts from small eimerias, but insufficient to control E. macusaniensis (Table 2). It could be due to the larger size and structures of parasite22. That does not allow the effect elicited in small species17, this finding would indicate that higher doses of toltrazuril, than those recommended by Ballweber10 (15-20 mg/kg/LW), are effective to control of eimerias. E. macusaniensis contrary to OPG from E. alpacae, E. lamae and E. macusaniensis are not affected. To date, no studies have yet been, reported regarding prophylactic doses of toltrazuril in alpacas, nor its effect on the different species of eimerias.

The present work reports that by applying 22.5 and 30 mg/Kg LW of toltrazuril in single doses. It acts as a prophylactic, managing to control elimination of oocysts of E. punoensis, E. alpacae, E. lamae and E. macusaniensis. The drug could be used to reduce the spread of eimerias and the presentation of eimeriosis in baby alpacas.

REFERENCES

1. Quispe EC, Rodríguez TC, Iñiguez LR, Mueller JP. Producción de fibra de alpaca, llama, vicuña y guanaco en Sudamérica. Anim Genet Resour 2009;45:1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1014233909990277Links ]

2. Díaz P, Panadero R, López R, Cordero A, Pérez-Creo A, López CM, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated to Eimeria spp . infection in unweaned alpacas (Vicugna pacos) from Southern Peru. Acta Parasitol 2016;61(1):74-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ap-2016-0008Links ]

3. Barrientos Gallardo VA. Parasitos gastrointestinales de camélidos sudamericanos: Revisión bibliografica [tesis licenciatura]. [Valdivia]: Universidad Austral de Chile; 2017 [citado 26 de abril de 2021]. Recuperado a partir de: http://cybertesis.uach.cl/tesis/uach/2017/fvb275p/doc/fvb275p.pdfLinks ]

4. Rojas M, Manchego A, Rocha CB, Fornells LA, Silva RC, Mendes GS, et al. Outbreak of diarrhea among preweaning alpacas (Vicugna pacos) in the southern Peruvian highland. J Infect Dev Ctries 2016;10(3):269-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.7398Links ]

5. Lucas JR, Morales S, Barrios M, Rodríguez J, Vásquez M, Lira B, et al. Patógenos involucrados en casos fatales de diarrea en crías de alpaca de la Sierra Central del Perú. Rev Investig Vet Peru 2016;27(1):169-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v27i1.11465Links ]

6. Guerrero C. Cocciddia (Protozoa: Eimeriidae) of the alpaca Lama pacos. J Protozool 1967;14(4): 613-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1967.tb02050.xLinks ]

7. Palacios C, Tabacchi L, Chavera A, López T, Santillán G, Sandoval N, et al. Eimeriosis en crías de alpacas: estudio anátomo histopatológico. Rev Investig Vet Perú 2004;15(2):174-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v15i2.1602Links ]

8. Noack S, Chapman HD, Selzer PM. Anticoccidial drugs of the livestock industry. Parasitol Res 2019;118(7):2009-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06343-5Links ]

9. Dubey JP. A review of coccidiosis in South American camelids. Parasitol Res 2018;117(7): 1999-2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-5890-yLinks ]

10. Ballweber LR. Ecto- and endoparasites of new world camelids. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2009;25(2):295-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2009.02.003Links ]

11. Iqbal A, Tariq KA, Wazir VS, Singh R. Antiparasitic efficacy of Artemisia absinthium, toltrazuril and amprolium against intestinal coccidiosis in goats. J Parasit Dis 2013;37(1):88-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-012-0137-9Links ]

12. Enemark HL, Dahl J, Enemark JM. Significance of timing on effect of metaphylactic toltrazuril treatment against eimeriosis in calves. Parasitol Res 2015;114 (Suppl 1):S201-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4526-8Links ]

13. Sánchez O, Romero J, Ramirez B. Utilización de sulfametazina y toltrazuril para la prevención de coccidiosis bovina en terneros de crianza artificial. Rev Med Vet 2006;97(6):227-32. [ Links ]

14. Odden A, Denwood MJ, Stuen S, Robertson LJ, Ruiz A, Hamnes IS, et al. Field evaluation of anticoccidial efficacy: A novel approach demons-trates reduced efficacy of toltrazuril against ovine Eimeria spp. in Norway. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2018;8(2):304-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2018.05.002Links ]

15. Harder A, Haberkorn A. Possible mode of action of toltrazuril: studies on two Eimeria species and mammalian and Ascaris suum enzymes. Parasitol Res 1989;76(1):8-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931064Links ]

16. Jöckel J, Wendt B, Löffler M. Structural and functional comparison of agents interfering with dihydroorotate, succinate and NADH oxidation of rat liver mitochondria. Biochem Pharmacol 1998;56 (8):1053-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-2952(98)00131-2Links ]

17. McKenna PB. Eimeria macusaniensis in camelids - a brief review. Surveillance 2006;33(4):8-10. [ Links ]

18. Rojas M. Nosoparasitosis de los rumiantes domesticos peruanos. Rev Peru Parasitol 2010;18 (2):58-9. [ Links ]

19. Barriga Val OO, editor. Las enfermeades parasitarias de los animales domesticos en la America Latina. Santiago: Editorial Germinall; 2002. 247 p. [ Links ]

20. Statgraphics Centurion XVIII [Internet]. Statgraphics. 2017 [citado 5 de mayo de 2018]. Recuperado a partir de: https://statgraphics.net/caracteristicas/Links ]

21. Ruiz JD. Factores fisiológicos que modifican la acción de los fármacos en medicina veterinaria. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2016:14(1):36-8. [ Links ]

22. Guerrero CA, Hernández J, Bazalar H, Alva J. Eimeria macusaniensisn n. sp. (Protozoa: Eimeriidae) of the alpaca Lama pacos. J Protozool 1971; 18(1):162-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1971.tb03299.xLinks ]

23. Rosadio R, Londoñe P, Pérez D, Castillo H, Véliz A, Llanco L, et al. Eimeria macusaniensis associa-ted lesions in neonate alpacas dying from enterotoxemia. Vet Parasitol 2010;168(1-2):116-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.10.010Links ]

24. Salazar Robayo CI, Galecio JS (dir). Prevalencia de parasitos gastrointestinales en alpacas del Inga Alto, Pichincha [tesis licenciatura]. [Quito]: Universidad San Francisco de Quito; 2015 [citado 26 de marzo de 2021]. Recuperado a partir de: https://repositorio.usfq.edu.ec/handle/23000/5880Links ]

25. Camareno E, Chávez A, Pinedo R, Leyva V. Prevalencia de Eimeria spp en alpacas de dos comunidades del Distrito de Macusani, Puno, Perú. Rev Investig Vet Peru 2016;27(3):573-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v27i3.11990Links ]

26. Kultscher L, Hinney B, Schmäschke R, Joachim A, Wittek T. Current anthelmintic treatment is not always effective at controlling strongylid infections in German alpaca herds. Parasit Vectors 2019; 12(1):330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3588-3Links ]

27. Quina Quina Y. Parasitismo gastrointestinal en crías de alpaca (Vicugna pacos) post nacimiento del Centro de Investigación y Producción La Raya-Puno [tesis licenciatura]. [Puno]: Universidad Nacional del Altiplano Puno; 2015 [citado 26 de marzo de 2021]. Recuperado a partir de: http://repositorio.unap.edu.pe/handle/UNAP/2568?show=fullLinks ]

28. Cebra CK, Mattson DE, Baker RJ, Sonn RJ, Dearing PL. Potential pathogens in feces from unweaned llamas and alpacas with diarrhea. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;223(12):1806-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.223.1806Links ]

29. Joachim A, Altreuther G, Bangoura B, Charles S, Daugschies A, Hinney B, et al. WAAVP guideline for evaluating the efficacy of anticoccidials in mammals (pigs, dogs, cattle, sheep). Vet Parasitol 2018;253:102-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.02.029Links ]

ID of the article:097/JSAAS/2021

Funding source The study was financed with the authors' own resources.

Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgements We thank the Director of CICAS La Raya Dr. Virgilio Alarcón (R.I.P.) for providing the facilities for access to the animals, to the students of the Professional School of Veterinary Medicine of the San Antonio Abad University of Cusco for having offered his support in taking samples.

Ethical considerations The study had the approval of the Director of the Professional School Dr. Walter Bravo Matheus and Dr. Virgilio Alarcón (RIP), because at that time the Faculty of Agrarian Sciences of the San Antonio Adab University of Cusco did not yet have the organization of an Ethics committee.

Authors' contribution to the articleSánchez-Herencia Diana, wrote the manuscript and the experimental part of the research. Mamani-Mango Guiulfo, performed the experimental design and writing of the manuscript. Coila-Añasco Pedro, carried out the writing and final revision of the manuscript.

Limitations in the research There were no limitations for the development of the research.

Editor's Note: Journal of the Selva Andina Animal Science (JSAAS) remains neutral with respect to jurisdictional claims published on maps and institutional affiliations.

Received: June 01, 2021; Revised: August 01, 2021; Accepted: August 01, 2021

*Contact address: National University of San Antonio Abad del Cusco. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences. Professional School of Veterinary Medicine Sicuani Headquarters. Av. La Cultura 733, Cusco, Peru. Diana Sánchez-Herencia E-mail address: diana.sanchez@unsaac.edu.pe

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons