SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 número1Impacto del cambio climático en los procesos productivos, la biodiversidad y los ecosistemas. Su relación con la seguridad alimentariaImpacto socioeconómico del cambio climático y sus estrategias de mitigación en Etiopía índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Journal of the Selva Andina Biosphere

versão impressa ISSN 2308-3867versão On-line ISSN 2308-3859

J. Selva Andina Biosph. vol.13 no.1 La Paz  2025  Epub 31-Maio-2025

https://doi.org/10.36610/j.jsab.2025.130100041 

ARTÍCULOS DE REVISION

Agroforestry practices: a necessity for improving agricultural productivity and soil fertility in different agroecological zones of Ethiopia

Prácticas agroforestales: una necesidad para mejorar la productividad agrícola y la fertilidad del suelo en diferentes zonas agroecológicas de Etiopía

Deresu Zerfu Wariyo1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-0132

1Ethiopian Environment and Forest Research Institute. Ethiopian Forestry Development. Addis Ababa. Yeka Sub City, Wereda 9 (Gurd Shola). Ethiopia. Phone: +251921747911


Abstract

In many parts of Ethiopia, there are serious problems of soil fertility loss and increasing land degradation. This study examines how agroforestry practices affect soil fertility and agricultural production in various agroecological zones in Ethiopia. Various agroforestry practices were employed across the country, including scattered trees in rangelands, forest parks, hedgerows, alley cropping, intercropping, and shifting cultivation. This article reviewed these practices by collecting secondary data from published articles, books, and journals on agroforestry practices that improve agricultural productivity and soil fertility in different agroecological regions of Ethiopia. The study findings suggest that agroforestry practices have a positive impact on agricultural production and soil fertility in various agroecological zones. Furthermore, they help reduce soil erosion, water loss, and organic matter depletion, thereby contributing to increased agricultural productivity. Soil fertility loss poses a serious threat to agricultural crop growth, impacting social well-being and sustainable economic development. The study notes that soil fertility and agricultural productivity can be significantly improved by adopting agroforestry techniques.

Keywords: Forest farming; nutrient recycles; small holder; alley cropping

Resumen

En muchas partes de Etiopía, existen graves problemas de pérdida de fertilidad del suelo y creciente degradación de la tierra. Este estudio examina cómo las prácticas agroforestales afectan la fertilidad del suelo y la producción agrícola en diversas zonas agroecológicas de Etiopía. Se emplearon diversas prácticas agroforestales en todo el país, incluyendo árboles dispersos en pastizales, parques forestales, setos vivos, cultivos en hileras, cultivos intercalados y agricultura migratoria. Este artículo revisó estas prácticas mediante la recopilación de datos secundarios de artículos, libros y revistas publicados sobre prácticas agroforestales que mejoran la productividad agrícola y la fertilidad del suelo en diferentes regiones agroecológicas de Etiopía. Los hallazgos del estudio sugieren que las prácticas agroforestales tienen un impacto positivo en la producción agrícola y la fertilidad del suelo en diversas zonas agroecológicas. Además, ayudan a reducir la erosión del suelo, la pérdida de agua y el agotamiento de la materia orgánica, lo que contribuye a una mayor productividad agrícola. La pérdida de fertilidad del suelo representa una grave amenaza para el crecimiento de los cultivos agrícolas, impactando el bienestar social y el desarrollo económico sostenible. El estudio señala que la fertilidad del suelo y la productividad agrícola pueden mejorarse significativamente mediante la adopción de técnicas agroforestales.

Palabras clave: Agricultura forestal; reciclaje de nutrientes; pequeños agricultores; cultivos en callejones

Introduction

Agroforestry, the integration of trees and shrubs into agricultural landscapes, is increasingly recognized as a vital practice for sustainable land management worldwide. It enhances biodiversity, improves soil fertility, and boosts crop yields while mitigating climate change through carbon sequestration1. In sub-Saharan Africa, where land degradation and food insecurity are prevalent, agroforestry systems such as alley cropping and silvopasture have shown promise in restoring degraded soils and increasing farm productivity2,3. However, challenges such as limited access to quality tree seedlings, land tenure issues, and competition for resources between trees and crops hinder widespread adoption4. Despite these constraints, agroforestry remains a key strategy for resilient farming systems, particularly in regions vulnerable to environmental degradation.

In Ethiopia, where over 80 % of the population relies on agriculture for their livelihood, agroforestry presents a viable solution to address the challenges of land degradation, soil fertility loss, and food insecurity. Integrating trees into farming systems has been shown to improve soil health, enhance crop productivity, and provide additional income sources for smallholder farmers. Successful agroforestry initiatives in regions such as Southern Ethiopia, Tigray, Oromia, and Amhara demonstrate the potential of these practices to restore degraded lands and strengthen food security. For example, integrating trees into farming systems has led to improved crop productivity and strengthened food security, particularly in regions prone to soil erosion and nutrient depletion5,6, and agroforestry contributes to soil health enhancement and environmental sustainability, especially in degraded highland areas7. These findings suggest that agroforestry not only mitigates land degradation but also supports the livelihoods of small holder farmers by diversifying income sources and increasing resilience to climatic shocks.

However, scaling up these successes requires concerted efforts from the government and stakeholders to provide necessary support and resources. Key challenges in Ethiopia are rapid population growth, per capita food output reduction, and environmental deterioration. Due to the need for agricultural intensification and population growth, impoverished farmers must expand their operations to marginal and hilly areas8. The highlands of Northern Ethiopia are home to a dense population, small land holdings, and concurrent soil degradation9. This is also the case in Southern Ethiopia, where there is deforestation, steeper slope farming, tiny household land holding sizes, and high population density10.

This population density quickens the pace of land degradation due to a combination of diminishing soil fertility, pressure for limited natural resources, and resource neglect11. Believe that the efficiency of crops in agriculture is primarily determined by soil fertility, with a decline in soil fertility serving as the primary cause of low agricultural output. Declining soil fertility and land degradation are emerging as major barriers affecting agricultural output and human welfare in tropical Africa12. By estimations, 37 Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries' 200 million hectares of cultivated land have lost an average of 660 kg of nitrogen (N), 75 kg of phosphorus (P), and 450 kg of potassium (K) ha-1 over the past 30 years13.

The State that agroforestry is one strategy for preventing land degradation and enhancing soil fertility, particularly in the woodland regions14. Agroforestry, is described as a collective term for land-use systems in which woody perennials (bushes, shrubs, and many others) are grown in affiliation with herbaceous plant life (crops, pastures), or cattle, in a spatial association, a transient association on the same piece of land, for both ecological and economic advantage15. It comprises cultivating arable vegetation and tree species on an equal area of land, resulting in special ecological interactions and optimized financial gains. Suggesting that the best place to start when considering agroforestry choices is with the species that farmers are most familiar with16,17. To motivate individual farmers to plant trees, approaches to enhancing smallholder crop productivity should first recognize the benefits and drawbacks of the existing indigenous farming methods18.

Additionally, Ficus thonninigii (blume), an indigenous species of tree that offers year-round animal feed, money, medicine, timber, and soil and water conservation, is cultivated and managed by the people of the Ahferom district in the Tigray region19. Fundamentally, Faidherbia albida is a multipurpose tree that is planted across Ethiopia to increase soil fertility and provide rural populations with fuel and food20. Aside from scattered trees on farms, many farmers in Ethiopia's distinct agroecology zones undertake various agroforestry practices. Even though local communities in Ethiopia's diverse agro-ecological zones recognize agroforestry activities as crucial for boosting soil fertility and crop yields, there is a scientific knowledge fissure surrounding these techniques. As a result, this study aimed at conducting a review of the role of agroforestry in improving agricultural productivity and soil fertility across Ethiopia’s varying agro-ecologies.

Development

Agroforestry plays a crucial role in enhancing agricultural productivity and maintaining soil fertility, especially in diverse agro-ecological zones like those found in Ethiopia. By integrating trees with crops and livestock, agroforestry systems improve soil structure, increase nutrient cycling, and offer protection against erosion and land degradation. This synergy not only boosts farm yields but also strengthens the resilience of agricultural landscapes to climate variability. Given Ethiopia’s dependence on agriculture for livelihoods and food security, promoting agroforestry practices is essential for sustainable land management and long-term agricultural development.

Agroforestry techniques. Provide practical strategies for utilizing a range of specific skills and knowledge to build robust rural production systems. Trees are a preferred land use that offers both products and environmental benefits21. Report that in addition to the obvious environmental benefits, trees also have social and economic benefits22. Traditional agroforestry practices that are common in tropical climates include scattered trees on crop fields, homestead tree planting, multistory home gardens, woodlots, home gardens, coffee shade-based scattered trees on farms, and trees on grazing grounds.

Agroforestry, which is practiced by several local groups in Ethiopia, is crucial for a variety of reasons, including food security, the enhancement of the microclimate, economic advantages, environmental protection, home energy, household utensils, cultural values, traditional medicines, and fodder. Agroforestry techniques assist in the adaptation and mitigation of climate change, which contributes to the achievement of the United Nations Millennium Development Goals. The approaches' use of agroforestry-based soil fertility and land management strategies has helped in the fight against hunger. While food supply has improved in developing countries, the average number of individuals experiencing food insecurity has decreased globally23.

Soil fertility. The inherent ability of soil to supply plants with the proper ratios and amounts of nutrients for growth, free from harmful concentrations of any element, and where the quality of the soil serves as an indication for assessing soil fertility24. Soil nutrients are lost from the system in form of erosion, gaseous form, and crop harvesting, and leaching. The primary reason behind African farmers' low earnings and food insecurity of the depletion of soil fertility, 22 kg of nitrogen, 2.5 kg of phosphorus, and 15 kg of okay are lost annually from agricultural soils in the surrounding South African area25. Nevertheless, it's crucial to distinguish from terrible soil fertility brought on by outside factors and declining soil fertility as a result of past land usage while setting up the supply of poor crop yields26.

Nutrient cycling. The theory behind agroforestry argues that tree roots can reach portions of the soil outline that annual crop root systems would not be able to, and tree crops can then take up nutrients from these regions of the profile27. The aboveground plant components (leaves, twigs, stems, etc.) and a significantly larger root mass in the surface horizons subsequently absorb these nutrients. The primary ways that trees affect soil qualities are through their roots and through the accumulation of aboveground organic matter through litter fall and trimming.

One important benefit of agroforestry systems is the release of nutrients through the breakdown of tree litter and roots, especially when nitrogen-fixing plants are present28. Because they promote recycling and stop erosion, the trees increase the number of inputs (organic matter, nitrogen fixation, nutrient uptake) and decrease the losses (organic matter, nutrients). They also have a good effect on soil biological activities and enhance the physical characteristics of the soil, such as its capacity to retain water29.

Soil fertility improvement by agroforestry practices. Revealed that trees increase soil fertility after evaluating how they preserve and enhance soil productivity30. Agroforestry practices such as hedgerow intercropping, windbreaks, planted tree fallow, shifting cultivation, Taungya, trees on croplands, plantation crop combinations, and trees for soil conservation have all demonstrated an overall increase in soil productivity31. The primary results unequivocally show that shifting cultivation is a sustainable system so long as the length of fallow is adequate to return soil conditions to their pre-cultivation and pre-fallow conditions stages.

However, discovered that two-year-old Sesbania sesban followed quadrupled maize yields over six years when compared to continuous unfertilized maize production, despite going two years without crop output while the plant was growing32. If the fallow period can be shortened without compromising crop productivity or soil fertility. Studies have shown that enriching the soil is one of the functions of shade trees in plantation crop combinations33. Numerous investigations on the modifications of soil parameters in hedgerow intercropping have been carried out. Intercropping hedgerows alters the characteristics of the soil34.

Found that boosting moisture content and cereal crop productivity increased with nearest to the tree trunk35. As bulk density increases along the distance from the tree trunk. The results of this study, which compared maize grain yield under and outside of the canopy phase, show the impacts of dispersed Faidherbia albida and Croton macrostachyus trees on the physical and chemical qualities of the soil. For instance, the study by Manjur et al.35 demonstrated that both Faidherbia albida and Croton macrostachyus trees positively influenced soil physical properties and maize yield. Under the canopy of F. albida, bulk density decreased (0.9-1.01 g cm-³) and soil moisture content was higher (20.89-24.09 %) compared to outside the canopy, resulting in increased maize grain yields ranging from 64.87 to 76.20 qt ha-1. Similarly, soils under C. macrostachyus trees showed lower bulk density (0.92-1.05 g cm-³), higher moisture content (15.01-19.81 %), and enhanced maize yields (68.02-81.56 qt ha-1) relative to open fields (Manjur et al.35.

Process of soil improvement under agroforestry practice. In an agroforestry system, atmospheric fixation, trimming of woody compounds, and leaf litter all contribute nutrients. Tree roots may assist in bringing nutrients into the system from deeper soil layers that are typically thought to be unavailable to crops since they are situated below the rooting zone of annual crops36. Trees can replenish nutrients through dead organic matter (leaves, branches, twigs, fruits, and flowers), which improves the topsoil layer that is available for crops. Thus, an increase in soil structure and nutrient availability may be the biggest benefits of trees for soil37.

Nutrient recovery. By transporting nutrients from the soil to the earth's top through leaf shedding and other organic wastes, trees enrich the soil with more nutrients. To restore the soil's organic matter, sub-humid and semi-arid environments require 4 and 2 t of dry matter (above-ground leftovers) per hectare per year, and 8 and 2 t p yr-1, respectively38. To analyze, legume trees grown in alley cropping systems could yield up to 20 t of dry matter annually39. These pruning’s could contain up to 358 kg of nitrogen, 28 kg of phosphorus, 232 kg of potassium, 144 kg of calcium, and 60 kg of sulfur.

Impact of agroforestry practice on soil fertility and cereal crop productivity. The effects of agroforestry practices on soil fertility and yearly crop productivity are explained in terms of the customs followed by the local population in various regions. Ethiopia has distinct agro-ecological zones by nature, and adaptation practices differ depending on these zones. He listed nine different agroforestry practices with varying ecological and social benefits across Ethiopia40. Under Faidherbia albida , sorghum yields in Ethiopia rose by 36 %20,41, also found that the production of barley was significantly influenced by both the distance from the center of the F. albida stem and the land use regime.

Agroforestry can take various forms in different parts of Ethiopia, such as enset-coffee, tree-spice-based, poem fruit trees, bamboo cumen vegetable farming.

Additionally, agroforestry is based on conservation with multiple perennial crops, including bamboo and cereal crops. Although the Enset-coffee agroforestry systems in southern Ethiopia also aim to generate money, the primary goal of these agroforestry systems is to meet household food demands42.

Parklands agroforestry practice. It is expressed as deliberate management of multipurpose trees on farmland for economic gain and environmental benefit. Such, Agroforestry techniques have a direct effect on the physical, chemical, and organic content of the soil, which can either raise or lower agricultural production. It is known that agroforestry techniques, such as the bio recycling of minerals, changes in the environment (such as thermal and moisture regimes), and the distribution of trees on croplands, can modify the microclimate, floral and faunal composition, and other ecosystem elements35.

An additional finding reports that the presence of F. albida greatly increased nitrogen and phosphorus utilization efficiencies, which in turn caused a considerable increase in wheat grain yields43. This particular tree species provided around 64 kg ha-1 yr-1 of mineral N. Wheat grown beneath F. albida has twice the P usage efficiency of wheat grown in open fields.

Other findings also report that nutrient inputs can be boosted through nitrogen fixation, wasteful nutrient losses can be reduced through leaching and erosion, and enhanced biological activity can be fostered by supplying biomass and a conducive environment44. Furthermore, yield improvement and increased soil fertility under irregular tree canopies45.

Another study conducted in Burkina Faso states that sorghum grain yields in improved by 14 % when grown beneath the shade of Cordia africana trees46. Furthermore, according, Acacia inhibits soil fertility and crop yield47. According to the study report that the soil bulk density rose from 0.19 to 0.26 as we proceeded from under-to-under tree cover, even though soil pH values varied from 5.5 under trees to 4.62 in open cultivated regions. Additionally, they discovered that when the distance from the tree stem to the open ground increases under the Acacia decurrens tree species, total N and C/N greatly change.

Alley-cropping is an agroforestry practice. Alley-cropping, according study by is an agroforestry system in which crops are grown in the gaps between hedgerows of trees and/or bushes48. Hedgerow trees and bushes are pruned down at planting and then again at regular intervals throughout the cropping season to minimize competition with food crops and prevent shadowing. The benefit of alley cropping is that it improves soil fertility, which increases crop productivity. Several studies have been conducted to assess the alley-cropping practices' potential for nutrient cycling. Some of the initial experiments on alley cropping were conducted, which discovered that 25-alley cropping raised agricultural yield and enhanced soil fertility49.

In one trial, they found that the mean dry matter additions as mulch fell between 5.85 and 7.09 mg ha yr-1, and the average nitrogen yield from pruning Leucaena leucocephala ranged from 171 to 208 kg ha yr-1. These trials also showed that applying fertilizer at the start of the cropping season can improve the system's ability to cycle nutrients such as nitrogen and dry matter. However also reviewed that total soil nitrogen was higher in the alley cropping treatment than in the other treatments, bulk density in the treatment showed a difference, even if it was not statistically significant, with only three repetitions50.

Alley cropping practices were conducted across different agro-ecology zones of Ethiopia and adapted by the local community for severe benefits such as soil erosion control, enhancing fuel wood, fodder, and soil fertility, etc. To that, soil organic carbon was higher in alley-cropped plots than in the control plots at both 0-10 and 10-30 cm depths51. On average, organic carbon was lower by over 20 % and 10 % in the control and Gliricidia plots, respectively, compared to Acacia plots.

Home garden agroforestry practice. In many tropical places, home gardens are essential to the subsistence economy as a result of their diverse range of crops and trees52. These places typically have high human population densities and landholdings that are smaller than one hectare on average. Due to their appropriate agroclimatic conditions for home garden agroforestry, Ethiopia's south and southwest were more defined by home garden agroforestry than any other location. Agroforestry in home gardens helps smallholders diversify their sources of income and control the productivity of the soil on a small plot of land surrounding the homestead.

This strategy included a variety of soil fertility management techniques, such as applying chemical fertilizer, applying animal manure, applying a combination of animal manure and chemical fertilizer, or applying neither manure nor fertilizer. These management techniques, which include intercropping with perennial trees and shrubs like maize, sorghum, and cash crops like chat and coffee in home gardens, also boost soil fertility and crop productivity. Home garden agroforestry techniques also increase the productivity of various vegetables. Determined that 60 agroforest farms in the Gedeo zone are home to 58 woody species, representing 49 genera and 30 families53. Comparably, 32 woody species from 19 groups were identified in a study done in Gununo Wolayita54. In a 100 m2 home garden in the Gedeo zone, 50 plant species from 35 families were recorded55.

Considering there are many trees and shrubs in home gardens, agroforestry practices have a significant potential for sequestering carbon while also promoting food and nutrition security.

Intercropping agroforestry practices. Around the world, intercropping, the simultaneous growth of two or more crop species in a single field area under a range of tree species, is a widely used technique56. Different studies have shown that intercropping practices have a noticeable effect on preserving soil organic matter, lowering soil surface evaporation due to leaf fall mulch, providing cover for plants that require shade, like coffee, and providing shade for people when they are working on the farm. According to intercropping gives a profit advantage when the overall plant density is higher than that of either of the sole crops57. Intercropping maize with the Gora faba bean variety at a 50% density resulted in a 13% increase in total grain yields, a 42% rise in economic return, and a 38% improvement in land equivalent ratio compared to growing maize alone58.

In Ethiopia's several agro-ecological zones, intercropping of different fruit trees is rather common. For example, bananas and mango trees can be grown together. The broad canopy of the mango trees will lessen wind speed and lessen competition for resources since these plants have a different rooting system that enables them to acquire soil nutrients and water from the various strata of the soil profile. Another important main crop grown in the area, maize, is also grown using this technique. This method's nitrogen-fixing trees will also aid in nutrient recycling, enabling production in a cost-effective and ecologically friendly way47.

While agroforestry has proven effective in improving soil fertility and agricultural productivity, alternatives such as conservation agriculture, integrated soil fertility management, and organic farming also offer viable solutions. Conservation agriculture, which emphasizes minimal soil disturbance, permanent soil cover, and crop rotation, can reduce erosion and enhance soil structure. Integrated soil fertility management promotes the combined use of mineral fertilizers and organic inputs to optimize soil health and crop yields. Moreover, organic farming systems, by emphasizing composting and biological soil enrichment, offer environmentally sustainable paths to restoring degraded soils. Nonetheless, these approaches often require substantial technical support, farmer training, and initial investment, which can be challenging for smallholder farmers. Thus, integrating agroforestry with these complementary practices can offer a holistic and practical solution to Ethiopia’s ongoing challenges of land degradation and declining soil fertility.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes that agroforestry practices are essential for improving soil fertility and agricultural productivity across Ethiopia’s diverse agro-ecological zones. By reviewing existing literature, the findings of this study show that integrating trees into agricultural systems enhances soil organic matter, reduces erosion, and supports sustainable crop production. Agroforestry practices such as home gardens, alley cropping, scattered trees on croplands, and intercropping not only contribute to environmental sustainability but also strengthen rural livelihoods and food security. The findings highlight that agroforestry remains a practical, multifunctional solution to the pressing issues of land degradation, soil nutrient depletion, and climate change impacts. Continued support for and expansion of agroforestry practices are critical for achieving long-term agricultural resilience and environmental conservation in Ethiopia.

Cited Literature

1. Sida TS, Baudron F, Kim H, Giller KE. Climate-smart agroforestry: Faidherbia albida trees buffer wheat against climatic extremes in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Agric For Meteorol 2018;248: 339-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.013Links ]

2. Fahad S, Chavan SB, Chichaghare AR, Uthappa AR, Kumar M, Kakade V, et al. Agroforestry systems for soil health improvement and maintenance. Sustainability 2022;14(22):14877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214877Links ]

3. Mbow C, Smith P, Skole D, Duguma L, Bustamante M. Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2014;6:8-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.09.002Links ]

4. Coe R, Sinclair F, Barrios E. Scaling up agroforestry requires research 'in'rather than 'for'development. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2014;6:73-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.013Links ]

5. Hassan M, Hadgu KM, Birhane E, Muthuri CW, Mwangi A, Mowo J, et al. Agroforestry in Ethiopia: using trees on farms to boost crop productivity and strengthen food security [Internet]. World Agroforestry. Nairobi: The Center for International Forestry Research; 2016. [cited May 16, 2023]. p. 2-4. Retrieved from: https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/25550/Links ]

6. Chemeda BA, Wakjira FS, Birhane E. The role of coffee-based agroforestry in improving food security through dietary diversification. Discov Agric 2024;2(1):131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-024-00148-6Links ]

7. Bogale D. Agroforestry systems in Ethiopia: A systematic review of climate change mitigation, adaptation, and sustainable land management potential. F1000Research 2025;14:286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.160723.1Links ]

8. Amenu BT. Home-garden agro-forestry practices and its contribution to rural livelihood in Dawro Zone Essera District. J Environ Earth Sci 2017;7 (5):88-96. [ Links ]

9. Nyssen J, Frankl A, Zenebe A, Deckers J, Poesen J. Land management in the northern Ethiopian highlands: local and global perspectives; past, present and future. Land Degrad Dev 2015;26(7): 759-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2336Links ]

10. Madalcho AB, Tefera MT The effect of agro-forestry practices and elevation gradients on soil chemical properties in Gununo Watershed, Ethiopia. Int J Environ Agric Res 2016:2(1):1-7. [ Links ]

11. Lynch J. The role of nutrient-efficient crops in modern agriculture. J Cop Prod 1998;1(2):241-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J144v01n02_10Links ]

12. Nkonya E, Johnson T, Kwon HY, Kato E. Economics of land degradation in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Nkonya E, Mirzabaev A, von Braun J, editors. Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement - A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 215-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19168-3_9Links ]

13. Drechsel P, Gyiele LA. The economic assessment of soil nutrient depletion: Analytical issues for framework development [Internet]. Bangkok: International Board for Soil Research and Management; 1999 [cited May 22, 2024]. 90 p. Retrieved from: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/items/fd02f79b-2ea8-4448-90b4-16b8d63622dbLinks ]

14. Singh V, Johar V, Kumar R, Chaudhary M. Socio-economic and environmental assets sustainability by agroforestry systems: a review. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol 2021;14(4):521-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30954/0974-1712.04.2021.6Links ]

15. Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD. Definition and concepts of agroforestry. In: Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD, editors. An Introduction to Agroforestry: Four Decades of Scientific Developments. New York: Springer Nature; 2021. p. 21-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75358-0_2Links ]

16. Glaze-Corcoran S, Hashemi M, Sadeghpour A, Jahanzad E, Afshar RK, Liu X, et al. Understanding intercropping to improve agricultural resiliency and environmental sustainability. Adv Agron 2020;162:199-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2020.02.004Links ]

17. Fleming A, O'Grady AP, Mendham D, England J, Mitchell P, Moroni M, et al. Understanding the values behind farmer perceptions of trees on farms to increase adoption of agroforestry in Australia. Agron Sustain Dev 2019;39:9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0555-5Links ]

18. Gindaba J, Rozanov A, Negash L. Trees on farms and their contribution to soil fertility parameters in Badessa, eastern Ethiopia. Biol Fertil Soils 2005; 42(1):66-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-005-0859-2Links ]

19. Berhe DH, Anjulo A, Abdelkadir A, Edwards S. Evaluation of the effect of Ficus thonningii (blume) on soil physicochemical properties in Ahferom district of Tigray, Ethiopia. J Soil Sci Environ Manag 2013;4(2):35-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JSSEM13.0369Links ]

20. Ereso T. The role of Faidherbia albida tree species in parkland agroforestry and its management in Ethiopia. J Hortic For 2019;11(3):42-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JHF2018.0570Links ]

21. Verma S, Singh V, Verma DK, Giri SP. Agroforestry practices and concepts in sustainable land use systems in India. Internat J Forestry & Crop Improv 2016;7(1):126-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJFCI/7.1/126-131Links ]

22. Pantera ?, Mosquera-Losada MR, Herzog F, Den Herder M. Agroforestry and the environment. Agroforest Syst 2021;95:767-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00640-8Links ]

23. Parry M, Rosenzweig C, Iglesias A, Fischer G, Livermore M. Climate change and world food security: a new assessment. Glob Environ Change 1999;9 Supl 1:51-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(99)00018-7Links ]

24. Estrada-Herrera IR, Hidalgo-Moreno C, Guzmán-Plazola R, Almaraz Suárez JJ, Navarro-Garza H, Etchevers-Barra JD. Soil quality indicators to evaluate soil fertility. Agrociencia 2017;51(8): 813-31. [ Links ]

25. Stoorvogel J, Smaling E. Assessment of soil nutrient depletion in Sub-Saharan Africa: 1983-2000 [Internet]. Wageningen: The Winand Staring Centre, Wageningen; 1990 [cited April 26, 2024]. Report No. 28. Retrieved from: https://edepot.wur.nl/493679Links ]

26. Willy DK, Muyanga M, Mbuvi J, Jayne T. The effect of land use change on soil fertility parameters in densely populated areas of Kenya. Geoderma 2019;343:254-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.02.033Links ]

27. Cardinael R, Mao Z, Chenu C, Hinsinger P. Belowground functioning of agroforestry systems: recent advances and perspectives. Plant Soil 2020; 453:1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04633-xLinks ]

28. Sileshi GW, Mafongoya PL, Nath AJ. Agroforestry systems for improving nutrient recycling and soil fertility on degraded lands. In: Dagar JC, Gupta SR, Teketay D, editors. Agroforestry for Degraded Landscapes. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 225-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4136-0_8Links ]

29. Nair P, Kang B, Kass D. Nutrient Cycling and soil-erosion control in agroforestry systems. In: Juo ASR, Freed RD, editors. Agriculture and the Environment: Bridging Food Production and Environmental Protection in Developing Countries. Guilford Road, Madison: American Society of Agronomy; 1995. p. 117-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub60.c7Links ]

30. Pinho RC, Miller RP, Alfaia SS. Agroforestry and the improvement of soil fertility: a view from Amazonia. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2012;(1):6163 83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/616383Links ]

31. Sanchez PA. Soil productivity and sustainability in agroforestry systems. In: Steppler HA, Nair PR, editors. Agroforestry: A decade of development [Internet]. Nairobi: International Council for Research in Agroforestry; 1987. p. 205-23. Retrieved from: https://apps.worldagroforestry.org/Units/Library/Books/Book%2007/agroforestry%20a%20decade%20of%20development/html/4_soil.htm?n=22Links ]

32. Kwesiga F, Coe R. The effect of short rotation Sesbania sesban planted fallows on maize yield. For Ecol Manage 1994;64(2-3):199-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)90294-1Links ]

33. Beer J. Advantages, disadvantages and desirable characteristics of shade trees for coffee, cacao and tea. Agroforest Syst 1987;5:3-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046410Links ]

34. Bashir R, Norman RJ, Bacon RK, Wells BR. Accumulation and redistribution of fertilizer nitrogen-15 in soft red winter wheat. Soil Sci Soc Am J 1997;61(5):1407-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100050018xLinks ]

35. Manjur B, Abebe T, Abdulkadir A. Effects of scattered F. albida (Del) and C. macrostachyus (Lam) tree species on key soil physicochemical properties and grain yield of maize (Zea Mays): a case study at umbulo Wacho watershed, southern Ethiopia. Wudpecker J Agric Res 2014;3(3):63-73. [ Links ]

36. Pierret A, Maeght JL, Clément C, Montoroi JP, Hartmann C, Gonkhamdee S. Understanding deep roots and their functions in ecosystems: an advocacy for more unconventional research. Ann Bot 2016;118(4):621-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw130Links ]

37. Misra P. Soil fertility management in agroforestry system. Int J Biotechnol Biochem 2011;7(5):637-44. [ Links ]

38. Young A. Modelling soil changes under agroforestry. In: Young A, editor. Agroforestry for soil conservation [Internet]. Wallingford: CAB International; 1989. p. 197-211. Retrieved from: https://www.cifor-icraf.org/publications/downloads/Publications/PDFS/B05682.pdfLinks ]

39. Szott LT, Fernandes EC, Sanchez PA. Soil-plant interactions in agroforestry systems. For Ecol Manage 1991;45(1-4):127-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(91)90212-ELinks ]

40. Bekele-Tesemma A, editor. Profitable agrofores-try innovations for Eastern Africa [Internet]. Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre; 2007 [cited May 12, 2023]. 388 p. Retrieved from: https://www.cifor-icraf.org/publications/downloads/Publications/PDFS/B15073.pdfLinks ]

41. Poschen P. An evaluation of the Acacia albida-based agroforestry practices in the Hararghe highlands of Eastern Ethiopia. Agroforestry Syst 1986;4:129-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141545Links ]

42. Negash M. Trees management and livelihoods in Gedeo's agroforests, Ethiopia. Forests Trees and Livelihoods 2007;17(2):157-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2007.9752591Links ]

43. Sida TS, Baudron F, Ndoli A, Tirfessa D, Giller KE. Should fertilizer recommendations be adapted to parkland agroforestry systems? Case studies from Ethiopia and Rwanda. Plant Soil 2020; 453:173-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04271-yLinks ]

44. Mamo D, Asfaw A. Status of selected soil properties under Croton macrostachyus tree at Gemechis District, West Hararghe Zone, Oromia. Ethiop J Biol Agric Healthc 2017;7(8):31-5. [ Links ]

45. Kassa H, Gebrehiwet K, Yamoah C. Balanites aegyptiaca, a potential tree for parkland agroforestry systems with sorghum in Northern Ethiopia. J Soil Sci Environ Manage 2010;1(6):107-14. [ Links ]

46. Boffa JM. West African agroforestry parklands: keys to conservation and sustainable management. In: Dembner SA, Perlis A, editors. An international journal of forestry and forest industries [Internet]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2000. Retrieved from: https://www.fao.org/4/x3989e/x3989e04.htmLinks ]

47. Molla A, Linger E. Effects of Acacia decurrens (Green wattle) Tree on selected soil physico-chemical properties North-western Ethiopia. Res J Agric Environ Manag 2017;6(5):95-103. [ Links ]

48. Kang BT, Wilson GF. The development of alley cropping as a promising agroforestry technology. In: Steppler HA, Nair PR, editors. Agroforestry: a decade of development [Internet]. Nairobi: International Council for Research in Agroforestry; 1987. p. 227-43. Retrieved from: https://apps.worldagroforestry.org/Units/Library/Books/Book%2007/agroforestry%20a%20decade%20of%20development/html/5_the%20development%20of%20alley%20cropping.htm?n=24Links ]

49. Kang BT, Wilson GF, Sipkens L. Alley cropping maize (Zea mays L.) and leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala Lam) in southern Nigeria. Plant Soil 1981;63(2):165-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374595Links ]

50. Ferdush J, Karim MM, Himel R, Saha S, Ahamed T. Impact of alley cropping on wheat productivity. J Agric Vet Sci 2018;11(2):17-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-1102011725Links ]

51. Abdelkadir A. Root production, soil organic matter, soil moisture, and sorghum yield in an alley-cropping system with Acacia saligna (Labill.) Wendl. and Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp. in the Hararghe Highlands [doctoral thesis]. [Iowa]: Iowa State University; 1997 [cited May 26, 2024]. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/104473686/Root_production_soil_organic_matter_soil_moisture_and_sorghum_yield_in_an_alley_cropping_system_with_Acacia_saligna_Labill_Wendl_and_Gliricidia_sepium_Jacq_Walp_in_the_Hararghe_Highlands_Eastern_Ethiopia?uc-sb-sw=45465418https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/bitstreams/60c33dbc-f809-4b9a-bc77-9e2c1f715533/downloadLinks ]

52. Nair PKR. Homegardens. In: Nair PKR, editor. An introduction to agroforestry [Internet]. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1993. p. 85-97. Retrieved from: https://apps.worldagroforestry.org/Units/Library/Books/PDFs/32_An_introduction_to_agroforestry.pdf?n=161Links ]

53. Negash M, Yirdaw E, Luukkanen O. Potential of indigenous multistrata agroforests for maintaining native floristic diversity in the south-eastern Rift Valley escarpment, Ethiopia. Agroforest Syst 2012;85(1):9-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9408-1Links ]

54. Bajigo A, Tadesse M. Woody species diversity of traditional agroforestry practices in Gununo watershed in Wolayitta zone, Ethiopia. Forest Res 2015;4(4):1000155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9776.1000155Links ]

55. Negash M, Starr M, Kanninen M, Berhe L. Allometric equations for estimating aboveground biomass of Coffea arabica L. grown in the Rift Valley escarpment of Ethiopia. Agroforest Syst 2013; 87(4):953-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9611-3Links ]

56. Maitra S, Palai JB, Manasa P, Kumar DP. Potential of intercropping system in sustaining crop productivity. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol 2019;12(1):39-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30954/0974-1712.03.2019.7Links ]

57. Burgess AJ, Correa-Cano ME, Parkes B. The deployment of intercropping and agroforestry as adaptation to climate change. Crop Environ 2022; 1(2):145-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crope.2022.05.001Links ]

58. Gidey T, Berhe DH, Birhane E, Gufi Y, Haileslassie B. Intercropping maize with faba bean improves yield, income, and soil fertility in semiarid environment. Scientifica 2024;1:2552 695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2552695Links ]

Funding source There isn't any form of financial backing for this publication.

Conflicts of interest Author declares no conflict interest on publishing paper.

Acknowledgements I would like to thank the Ethiopian Forest Development Jimma Center for setting up the right internet service conditions so that this evaluation could be carried out.

Ethical considerations I hereby declare that the review conducted is original, has not been published elsewhere, and has been duly approved by all source materials.

Research limitations The author declares that there were no research limitations.

Permissions for publication Not applicable.

Generative Artificial Intelligence No generative artificial intelligence was used in this reperch.

Article ID: 158/JSAB/2024

Editor's Note: Journal of the Selva Andina Biosphere (JSAB). All statements expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, editors and reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Received: August 01, 2024; Revised: January 01, 2025; Accepted: February 01, 2025

*Contact address: Ethiopian Environment and Forest Research Institute. Ethiopian Forestry Development. Addis Ababa. Yeka Sub City, Wereda 9 (Gurd Shola). Ethiopia. Phone: +251921747911 Deresu Zerfu Wariyo E-mail address: milkideresu21@gmail.com

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons