SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 issue1Actualization List of species of the genus Tityus (Scorpionida: Buthidae) (Koch, 1843) in Bolivia author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Journal of the Selva Andina Research Society

Print version ISSN 2072-9294On-line version ISSN 2072-9308

J. Selva Andina Res. Soc. vol.14 no.1 La Paz  2023  Epub Mar 31, 2023

https://doi.org/10.36610/j.jsars.2023.140100010 

Artículo Original

In vitro antihypertensive activity by bioactive components of Andean grains

Peggy Brenda Gigliola-Ormachea1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4896-2797

Gastón Luis Nina-Mollisaca1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2590-3778

Nancy Alejandra Navia-Coarite1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4092-1456

Evelin Paty Mena-Gallardo1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0615-2190

Rosember Hurtado-Ulloa2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7462-7939

Lily Salcedo-Ortiz1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5508-4668

1Universidad Mayor de San Andrés. Institute of Chemical Research. Bio-organic Laboratory. University Campus of Cota Cota. Building of the Faculty of Pure and Natural Sciences. Calle Andrés Bello c. 27 s/n, CP 303. La Paz, Plurinational State of Bolivia.

122 Universidad Mayor de San Andrés. National Herbarium of Bolivia. Calle Andrés Bello c. 27 s / n. Campus Universitario Cota Cota. Casilla 1007, Tel: 22792582 int 1. Fax: (+591) 22770962.


Resumen

Los granos andinos (quinua, cañahua y tarwi) poseen reconocidas cualidades beneficiosas para la salud. El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar la actividad inhibitoria de extractos fenólicos (EF), proteínas hidrolizadas, fracciones peptídicas de quinua real blanca (QRB), quinua real negra (QRN), quinua real roja (QRR), quinua J’acha grano (QJG), quinua Ajara (QA) silvestre, quinua Phisanqalla (QP), quinua Kurmi (QK), cañahua (C) y tarwi (T) en la enzima convertidora de angiotensina I (ECA) in vitro, también se evaluó las harinas hidrolizadas con α amilasa/alcalasa (AMY/ALC) y α amilasa/flavourzyme (AMY/FLA) de QRB, QA, C, T. En adición, se evaluó contenido de flavonoides, concentración de proteínas, grado de hidrolisis (GH) y almidones. El contenido de flavonoides de los ecotipos de quinua presento una concentración entre 63 y 92 mg/mL, de C (43 mg/mL) y T (91 mg/mL). De la actividad inhibitoria de ECA, los EF de T y C expusieron 54.25±2.2 y 56.38±2.4 % de inhibición, los EF de las quinuas expusieron un promedio de 24 % de inhibición. Los hidrolizados proteicos y fracciones peptídicas obtenidas por digestión biológica por 4 enzimas: ALC, FLA y PAN, revelaron actividad inhibitoria de ECA mayor al 60 %, con PEP fue menor. De las harinas hidrolizadas con AMY/ALC, se separó un producto hidrosoluble (PHS) y no hidrosoluble (PNHS). Los IC50 de PHS obtenido por AMY/ALC para QRB (0.68 mg/mL), QA (0.38 mg/mL), C (0.74 mg/mL) y T (0.67 mg/mL). De las harinas tratadas con AMY/FLA, los IC50 de PHS fueron QRB (0.52 mg/mL), QA (0.49 mg/mL), C (0.48 mg/mL) y de T (0.72 mg/mL). Los resultados sugieren la posibilidad del desarrollo de alimentos modificados con actividad antihipertensiva.

Palabras clave: Actividad antihipertensiva; péptidos bioactivos; flavonoides; quinua; cañahua; tarwi; ECA; alimentos funcionales

Abstract

Andean grains (quinoa, cañahua and tarwi) have recognized health benefits. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the inhibitory activity of phenolic extracts (PE), hydrolyzed proteins, peptide fractions of royal white quinoa (QRB), royal black quinoa (QRN), royal red quinoa (QRR), J'acha grain quinoa (QJG), wild Ajara quinoa (QA), Phisanqalla quinoa (QP), Kurmi quinoa (QK), cañahua (QK) and tarwi (QA), quinoa Phisanqalla (QP), quinoa Kurmi (QK), cañahua (C) and tarwi (T) were evaluated on angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) in vitro, also the flours hydrolyzed with α amylase/alkylase (AMY/ALC) and α amylase/flavourzyme (AMY/FLA) of QRB, QA, C, T were evaluated. In addition, flavonoid content, protein concentration, degree of hydrolysis (GH) and starches were evaluated. The flavonoid content of the quinoa ecotypes ranged from 63 to 92 mg/mL, of C (43 mg/mL) and T (91 mg/mL). Of the RCT inhibitory activity, the T and C EFs exhibited 54.25±2.2 and 56.38±2.4 % inhibition, the quinoa EFs exhibited an average of 24 % inhibition. Protein hydrolysates and peptide fractions obtained by biological digestion by 4 enzymes: ALC, FLA and PAN, revealed ACE inhibitory activity higher than 60 %, with PEP it was lower. From the AMY/ALC hydrolyzed flours, a water-soluble product (PHS) and a non-water-soluble product (PNHS) were separated. The IC50 of PHS obtained by AMY/ALC for QRB (0.68 mg/mL), QA (0.38 mg/mL), C (0.74 mg/mL) and T (0.67 mg/mL). Of the AMY/FLA-treated flours, the IC50 of PHS were QRB (0.52 mg/mL), QA (0.49 mg/mL), C (0.48 mg/mL) and of T (0.72 mg/mL). The results suggest the possibility of the development of modified foods with antihypertensive activity.

Keywords: Antihypertensive activity; bioactive peptides; quinoa; cañahua; tarwi; ACE; functional foods

Introducción

Arterial hypertension is a multifactorial disease, whose treatment is based on pharmacological inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system at 3 points: angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE), direct action of angiotensin II and renin, many drugs synthetics are used to inhibit ACE1. A current alternative is to resort to foods with functional properties. Functional foods (FF) are defined as those and their food components that, taken as part of the diet, provide benefits beyond their traditional nutritional values, improving a function in the body or reducing disease risk2.

Since 1979, bioactive peptides with different biological activities were described, one of these activities obtained by hydrolysis with greater significance was antihypertensive. FF containing them may represent a new strategy for the prevention and/or treatment of hypertension. Antihypertensive peptides (AHP) were isolated from proteins of different foods of animal and plant origin3.

Bolivia is characterized by having different ecological floors, with high production of Andean grains (AG) by tradition, particularly in the Andean Altiplano. The AG, quinoa (Q), cañahua (C) and tarwi (T) (Chenopodium quinoa Willd, Chenopodium pallidicaule Aellen, Lupinus mutabilis Sweet), rustic crops, with resistance to drought, frost and salinity, considered today as food for high quality4.

The Q, is characterized by containing unsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids, type omega 3 and omega 6, high quality proteins, minerals, vitamins in a higher concentration than cereals, phytosterols, phenolic compounds that give them antioxidant properties, betalains, betaine-glycine. There is clinical evidence of its health benefits, which reveals improvements in the performance of athletes, recommended for people with anemia, dyslipidemia and lactose intolerance, as well as for people with celiacdisease5.

Of C (C. pallidicaule), a higher fiber content is reported, protein in quantity and quality similar to Q, contains phenolic compounds with high antioxidant properties, high mineral content6,7, high iron and zinc8 content, low saponins, that do not give it the characteristic bitter taste9, being a high-quality food alternative that does not need to be processed like Q and T.

Of the T (L. mutabilis Sweet), the highlight is the high protein content, even in relation to lupinus subspecies, high fatty acid content10, it has a high potassium, phosphorus and iron content11.

AHP are the most studied of the FF, with ACE inhibitory activity, related to the regulation of blood pressure by modulation of the renin-angiotensin system12.

Arterial hypertension is one of the pathologies with the highest prevalence worldwide, treated with various synthetic drugs that usually cause side effects, hence the search for natural compounds has increased, there are several peptides that are in markets in Europe, North America and Asia, various products that contain elucidated peptides, have the ability to reduce blood pressure13.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the inhibition capacity, in vitro, of phenolic extracts, protein hydrolysates, peptide fractions, and AG hydrolyzed flours on angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE).

Materials and methods

Raw material. The AG, white royal quinoa (WRQ), black royal quinoa (BRQ), cañahua (C) and tarwi (T) were provided by the food company Irupana Andean S.A. The varieties of quinoa J'acha Grano (QJG), wild Ajara quinoa (AQ), Kurmi quinoa (KQ) and Phisanqalla quinoa (PQ) from the Altiplano of La Paz were donated by the Umala Jurisdiction Quinoa Producers Association (ASPROQUIJU). JGQ and KQ are genetically improved by hybridization, promising for export14.

Obtaining phenolic extracts (PE). 100 g of each grain, Q, C and T, were weighed, ground and defatted with petroleum ether 2 times for 1 h, the phenolic compounds were extracted with methanol/water (85:15), then rotary evaporated, frozen and lyophilized, a second extraction was carried out with n-butanol/water (50:50), liquid/liquid separation, the organic phase was dried in a Buchi rotary evaporator.

Determination of total flavonoids (TF). TF (compounds containing keto groups at C4, C3 or C5 hydroxyl groups, and orthodi-hydroxyl groups in the B cycle, such as flavones and flavonols) were determined using the aluminum ion colorimetric method15 using quercetin (QE) as standard. The absorbance was measured at 510 nm in the Thermo Scientific genesys 10S UV/Visible spectrophotometer and the results were expressed in mg of quercetin equivalents per g of sample, dry weight15.

Proteins. Its quantification was carried out by the AOAC method established in the Bolivian Standard (N x 6.25)16.

Starches. Its determination was made by the AOAC 996.1117 method, using glucose standard curve.

Obtaining proteins. The isoelectric pH method was used, 50 g of flour from each grain (the grains were ground in a Bosch mill and sieved to 60-mesh), defatted in Soxhlet, the defatted flour was washed with distilled water at 200 mL to proceed to extract with 0.1 N sodium hydroxide until pH 9 and then precipitate with 0.1 N hydrochloric acid. The precipitate (proteins) was centrifuged and dried by lyophilization.

In vitro enzymatic digestion of AG proteins. Protein hydrolysates (PH) were obtained by enzymatic digestion, with alcalase (ALC) in borate buffer (pH 8.0), with flavorzyme (FLA) and pancreatin (PAN) in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), with pepsin (PEP) in citrate buffer (pH 3.0) separately. In each treatment, 1.0 g of protein (substrate) was reconstituted with 50 mL of the corresponding buffer. An enzyme/substrate (E/S) ratio of 1.5 was worked for 90 min in each case.

Degree of hydrolysis (DH). The protein extracted from the WRQ, JGQ and AQ varieties, the first refers to the typical export Q of the salar zone, the second modified by hybridization and the third wild, C and T, by the pH-stat18 method, work was carried out at 4% at 50º C and pH of 8.5 with borate buffer for the commercial enzyme ALC® 2.4 L and at pH of 7.0 at 50º C for FLA®, with phosphate buffer, at an E/S ratio of 2.0, monitoring was performed with a Thermo Scientific Orion A112 pH-meter using 0.1 N sodium hydroxide. Each analysis was performed in triplicate.

Using the following formula:

DH= hhtot*100

Where: DH = Degree of hydrolysis in %, h = Number of peptide bonds hydrolyzed in meq/g, htot = Total number of peptide bonds present in the protein in meq/g.

Peptide fractionation. The PH were dried in the laboratory lyophilizer (Telstar). For fractionation, Sephadex G-25 exclusion chromatography was used, using methanol as eluent. 5 mL aliquots were taken, each aliquot was dried in an oven at 37º C in Petri dishes. Fractionation monitoring was performed using thin layer chromatography (TLC) with eluent, butanol: acetic acid: water (3:1:1). It was developed with ninhydrin to join the equal fractions.

In vitro AG amylase/alcalase digestion of flour (AMY/ALC) and amylase/flavourzyme (AMY/FLA). The flour of each grain was obtained in a Bosch grain grinder, to then be sieved in 60 mesh steel sieves, ASTME 1116 standard, a suspension was prepared with WRQ, AQ, C flour at a concentration of 10 % with boiled water, without modifying the pH, which in all cases was between pH 5.5-6.0, suitable for AMY.

Enzyme Termamyl Sc. (AMY). At an E/S ratio of 0.6 considering the starch content in each case, at 82±1ºC for 1 h in a stirring bioreactor and adjustable temperature with a built-in pH-meter, after boiling for 5 min.

Alcalase® Enzyme 2.4 L (ALC). After treatment with AMY, it was conditioned at 50º C, conditioning the pH to 8.5, with ALC in an E/S ratio of 2.5, considering the protein content in each case with continuous agitation for 6 h. It was brought to a boil to complete the hydrolysis. In the case of T, it was treated directly with the protease previously defatted.

Flavourzyme® enzyme (FLA). After treatment with AMY, it was conditioned at 50º C, conditioning the pH to 7, with FLA in an E/S ratio of 1.5, considering the protein content in each case, under continuous agitation for 6 h. It was brought to a boil to complete the hydrolysis. In the case of T, it was treated directly with the protease, previously defatted due to the high fat content and almost no starch presence19.

Obtaining water-soluble and non-water-soluble product. Once the WRQ, QA, C and T flour hydrolysates were obtained, they were filtered in a 304 stainless steel basket filter-centrifuge, drum-type support, with removable filter cloth, with a 0.5 hp 220-380 VAC motor at 100 revolutions per minute (RPM) to obtain water-insoluble product (WIP) and water-soluble product (WSP). Both were dried by lyophilization.

Angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity. It was measured according to the method of Parris et al.20 with a slight modification. Enalapril was used as a positive control, sample, ACE and hippuryl-histidyl-leucine (HHL) solutions were prepared using 0.1 M sodium borate buffer (pH 8.3) containing 0.1 M sodium chloride. reaction mixture containing 200 µL of 5.83 M HHL, 80 µL of sample solution (2 mg/mL) and 20 µL of ACE solution (50 mU/mL) was incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 250 µl of 1 M hydrochloric acid followed by the addition of ethyl acetate. After vigorous shaking, the mixture was centrifuged for 5 min at 3500 rpm the top layer was placed in a tube. After evaporating the ethyl acetate in an oven at 80°C, the residue was dissolved in distilled H2O to measure the absorbance at 228 nm on a Thermo Scientific genesys 10S UV/Visible spectrophotometer. The ACE inhibition activity was expressed as 100 (1-X/C) %, where X and C were the absorbances of the sample and the control, respectively18. To obtain the IC50, samples were prepared at different concentrations in relation to their inhibition percentages21.

In the case of the hydrolyzed flours (HF) of the pseudocereals (WRQ, AQ, C), the sample was prepared at 0.75 mg/mL of protein contained in WSP and WIP. Del T was prepared at 2.0 mg/ml protein contained in WSP and WIP.

Statistic analysis. Each analysis was performed in triplicate and the results are expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD). Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and Dunn's22 post hoc test (significance of differences p < 0.05) was used to observe significant differences between data.

Results

Effect of FE on ACE inhibitory activity. T and C revealed a high activity, the FE of WRQ, BRQ, QJG, AQ, PQ and QK exhibited an average activity of 24.3% (Table 1), which represents a moderate activity, according to Dunn's test there are no significant differences each other (p<0.05).

Table 1 Total flavonoids and ACE inhibitory activity of phenolic extracts from Andean grains 

Sample Total flavonoids (mg QE/g) a % ACE inhibition Dunn's post hoc test*
Enalapril 91.20±3.1
Tarwi 91.25±0.8 54.25±2.2 A
Cañahua 42.78±1.2 56.38±2.2 A
White royal quinoa (WRQ) 91.75±0.8 26.75±1.8 B
Blak royal quinoa (BRQ) 72.38±1.8 22.38±1.8 B
Quinoa J'acha Grain (QJG) 84.8±1.2 24.8±1.2 B
Ajara quinoa (AQ) 63.95±0.6 25.5±2.0 B
Quinoa Phisanqalla (QP) 92.86±0.8 24.2±2.2 B
Quinoa Kurmi (QK) 77.82±0.06 22.4±1.2 B

a Values are the average of three determinations. * Similar letters do not show significant differences (p<0.05).

Tabla 2 Concentración de proteínas y almidones de granos andinos 

Analyte T a C a QRB a QRN a QJG a QA a
Proteins %* 48.5±0.4B 14.3±0.5A 15.4±0.3A 14.7±0.2A 13.8±0.3A 14.4±0.1A
Starches %* 1.8±0.2B 54.3±0.3A 53.1±0.4A 50.7±0.6A 55.3±0.8A 53.5±0.2A

a Values are average of 3 determinations. * Similar letters do not show significant differences (p<0.05), T Tarwi, C Cañahua. WRQ white royal quinoa, BRQ black royal quinoa, JGQ J'acha grain quinoa, AQ Ajara quinoa

Table 3 Degree of hydrolysis in % of Andean grain proteins 

Enzyme treatment Degree of hydrolysis (DH) %
QRB a QRN a QJG a QA a T a C a
ALC 25.2±0.2 24.6±0.4 25.6±0.2 24.4±0.3 16.8±0.4 19.4±0.3
FLA 24.1±0.3 23.8±0.2 24.8±0.4 23.4±0.2 14.8±0.2 12.8±0.5

a. The values are average of three determinations, ALC Alcalase, FLA Flavourzyme, QRB royal red quinoa, QRN royal black quinoa, QJG quinoa J'acha grano, QA quinoa Ajara, T tarwi, C cañahua.

Table 4 Antihypertensive activity in % of protein hydrolysates from Andean grains with 4 proteolytic enzymes, IC50 (mg/mL) 

Proteolytic enzymes Enalapril QRB a IC50 QA a IC50 C a IC50
Pepsina 91.2 ±3.1 43.7±1.8 1.52±0.08 33.4±3.1 2.06±0.12 46.2±1.6 1.82±0.08
Pancreatina 72.2±2.4 .90±0.12 62.4±1.4 1.04±0.11 62.2±3.1 1.04±0.14
Alcalase 67.2±2.1 .74±0.04 83.4±1.6 .68±0.08 49.3±1.1 1.42±0.08
Flavourzyme 74.1±2.2 .98±0.05 75.4±2.2 .88±0.08 75.6±2.2 .88±0.12
T a IC50 QRN a IC50 QJG a IC50
Pepsina 54.6±2.2 1.72±0.02 34.9±2.5 Nd 29.4±2.6 Nd
Pancreatina 64.3±3.2 1.40±0.08 61.5±2.1 Nd 63.3±2.4 Nd
Alcalasa 64.7±2.1 1.34±0.12 61.2±2.2 Nd 60.9±1.1 Nd
Flavourzyme 71.6±1.8 1.12±0.12 69.8±1.8 Nd 73.5±2.9 Nd

Analysis of proteins and starches. The concentration of proteins and starches of the AG is within expected ranges, similar in the 4 varieties WRQ, BRQ, QJG, QA and in C.

DH from Andean grain proteins (AG). In all cases, a DH greater than 10 % was obtained (Table 3). The different varieties WRQ, BRQ, QJG, QA, by application of ALC and FLA. From T and C lower protein DH is observed.

ACE inhibitory activity by AG protein hydrolysates. The treatment of hydrolyzed proteins with 4 enzymatic systems: PEP, PAN, ALC and FLA on the antihypertensive activity of ACE, the hydrolyzates treated with ALC, FLA and PAN exhibited an inhibitory activity greater than 60%, in most cases. (Table 4), the hydrolysates treated with PEP were those with the lowest inhibitory activity (<54.6 %), the one with the highest activity was the hydrolyzate of the wild QA treated with ALC (83.4).

%). ACE inhibitory activity by AG peptide fractions. Of the peptide fractions obtained by exclusion chromatography after carrying out the hydrolysis of each protein obtained from AG (WRQ, QJG, QA, T, C), with the enzymes (ALC, FLA, PAN and PEP), up to fraction 6 exposed of moderate to high activity (Table 5), the follow-up of obtaining peptide fractions was performed by TLC, as observed in Figure. The peptide fractions by application of ALC and FLA were those that exhibited the highest inhibitory activity in ACE up to fraction 6, reaching more than 80%. The treatments with PEP, exhibited an activity inhibitory between 50 and 70% in ACE. The treatment with ALC in proteins of the different varieties WRQ, QJG and QA exposed peptide fractions of similar inhibitory activity in ACE.

ACE inhibitory activity by hydrolyzed flours (HF) by AMY/ALC and AMY/FLA. Of the WRQ, QA, C and T flours treated with AMY/ALC and AMY/FLA enzymes sequentially. The WSP presented a high ACE inhibitory activity in relation to the WIP, which presented a considerably lower activity (Figure 2).

As can be seen in Table 6, the highest antihypertensive activity exhibited the WSP of QA with the AMY/ALC treatment showing an IC50 of 0.38 mg/mL, in the AMY/FLA treatment the WSP that showed the lowest IC50 were QA and C with 0.49 and 0.48 mg/mL. As can be seen in Figure 3, of the HF of WRQ, QA and C, the WSP obtained by the AMY/FLA treatment expresses an activity process at different concentrations similar in all cases, to inhibit 50 % of inhibitory activity of ECA with values close to 0.5 mg/mL. In the treatment with AMY/ALC, a higher concentration of the WRQ hydrolyzates was needed, and C (Table 6), highlights the activity of the QA hydrolyzate, which presents a concentration close to half that of WRQ and C to inhibit 50 % of ACE activity. In the case of T flour hydrolysates, it is observed that a higher concentration was needed to reach 50 % anti ACE activity.

Figure 1 Chromatographic runs on TLC of peptide fractions post hydrolysis by Alcalase 

Table 5 Antihypertensive activity of peptide fractions from Andean grains obtained by exclusion chromatography 

Fraction QRB QJG* QA* T C
ALC FLA PAN PEP ALC ALC ALC FLA PAN PEP ALC FLA PAN PEP
F1 82.5±3.2 81.2±1.2 74.4±2.4 68.8±3.1 72.2±2.4 80.2±2.5 85.1±2.2 84.4±2.8 76.7±2.8 67.2±1.1 61.1±2.2 70.2±2.5 62.2±3.1 64.1±.3.4
F2 80.4±3.4 76.6±.3.7 71.2±2.2 60.2±2.2 68.6±.4.1 78.0±2.2 82.2±3.2 81.2±3.2 72.0±2.2 65.4±2.2 72.2±1.8 61.1±2.1 61.7±2.8 66.7±3.1
F3 70.8±3.8 78.6±2.6 73.2±1.6 61.1±1.8 70.6±2.6 75.6±1.6 78.4±2.4 82.7±3.4 68.4±3.4 70.4±3.2 58.3±2.1 78.5±2.4 66.2±2.1 52.4±2.2
F4 72.6±4.2 75.4±4.1 70.2±1.2 54.6±1.2 57.4±4.5 78.8±3.2 77.1±3.2 73.2±2.4 70.1±2.8 58.2±4.1 71±4.2 70.2±1.8 58.0±4.0 55.2±2.6
F5 70.4±4.2 64.3±3.5 67.4±1.8 26.8±.2.4 66.5±3.5 76.2±1.8 70.0±2.1 72.0±2.8 61.5±2.1 62.6±2.8 54±2.1 51.2±4.1 55.2±3.2 50.4±2.1
F6 65.4±3.1 68.1±4.6 56.5±2.2 38.4±2.2 61.2±4.6 72.1±2.2 71.1±2.4 66.1±2.2 56.2±2.1 52.2±3.2 73±2.4 58.3±3.0 52.5±2.1 56.1±3.4
F7 55.4±3.2 60.4±2.2 50.2±2.8 16.2±1.6 46.4±2.8 66.4±2.6 44.1±1.1 62.5±2.4 54.0±2.6 56.1±2.1 54±4.1 33.1±1.6 44.6±2.4 52.2±2.1
F8 60.3±4.2 68.2±3.3 32.2±1.8 18.1±1.8 38.4±2.2 61.2±1.8 63.2±2.2 58.1±0.8 56.6±1.8 48.8±2.4 48±3.1 45.1±2.1 36.8±1.6 40.5±2..4
F9 23.2±1.3 54.4±3.8 27.2±1.6 16.1±2.2 40.3±3.3 51.1±2.4 33.6±1.4 55.1±3.1 48.2±3.1 49.2±2.1 35±2.8 18.2±1.5 28.4±2.3 36.6±1.1
F10 27.4±2.2 47.4±4.5 42.7±1.2 40.3±1.2 26.1±1.2 49.2±2.1 52.1±1.1 55.0±1.1 52.2±2.2 44.4±2.4 22±2.1 29.5±2.6 26.4±2.8 30.6±1.8
F11 15.8±1.2 34.9±7.2 16.4±1.2 8.2±2.2 13.0±1.4 44.5±2.4 19.4±2.1 58.2±2.6 39.4±2.1 18.2±2.1 20±2.4 12.8±2.0 14.8±1.8 18.1±1.6
F12 16.3±3.1 28.4±6.8 11.2±0.8 17.6±0.8 - 38.4±2.4 21.2±0.9 48.4±2.2 29.2±1.8 38.2±1.1 24±3.1 26.4±1.1 18.4±2.1 20.0±1.8
F13 24.5±3.2 27.4±3.2 25.4±1.9 52.5±1.8 - 28.0±1.7 27.7±1.2 41.6±1.8 16.1±2.2 41.1±0.8 10±1.1 18.5±0.8 16.2±0.9 20.2±2.2
F14 16.2±4.6 16.5±4.7 16.8±1.4 17.2±1.6 - - 13.3±1.4 37.1±1.1 16.1±1.4 18.6±3.2 12±0.8 20.4±1.2 14.8±2.0 17.1±1.1
F15 12.3±3.7 12.6±3.4 4.6±0.2 6.6±0.8 - - 11.2±1.1 15.2±0.8 12.8±1.1 10.8±2.4 14±2.1 16.0±1.8 8.2±2.2 2.4±0.8

*Treated only with Alcalase, Values are average of three determinations, ALC Alcalase, FLA Flavourzyme, PAN Pancreatina, PEP Pepsina, White Royal quinoa, QJG quinua J'acha grane, QA quinua Ajara, T tarwi, C cañahua

Figure 2 ACE inhibitory activity (%) by hydrolyzed flours from Andean grains (n=3) a) AMY/ALC, b) AMY/FLA, PHS: water-soluble product, PNHS: water-insoluble product White Royal Quinoa (QRB), quinoa Ajara (QA), tarwi (T), cañahua (C) 

Table 6 IC5O mg/mL of WSP of hydrolyzed flours of Andean grains in anti ACE activity 

QRB QA C T
IC50 (PHS) ALC FLA ALC FLA ALC FLA ALC FLA
.68±0.18 .52±0.08 .38±0.08 .49±0.06 .74±0.18 .48±0.08 .67±0.03 .72±0.04

The values are average of three determinations, WRQ white royal quinoa, QA Ajara quinoa, ALC alcalase, FLA flavourzyme, T tarwi, C cañahua

Figure 3 ACE inhibition process at different WSP concentrations of hydrolyzed flour (HF) from Andean grains: A. WRQ, QA and C by AMY/FLA treatment, B. WRQ, QA and C by AMY/ALC treatment, C. T for treatment with AMY/ALC and AMY/FLA 

Discusión

Of the AG, quinoa, C and T, the grain that obtained the highest reference in its functional qualities was Q, which has exhibited different health benefits, such as celiac disease, weight loss and/or metabolic parameters associated with diabetes, obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, postmenopausal disorders, improvement of physical condition5, royal quinoa is the most widely commercialized, which is why it is exported to different countries, has different ecotypes, WRQ, BRQ, RRQ. Among the quinoas of the present study, quinoas were also considered improved by hybridization, QJG and QK that are promising for export, particularly QJG14, because it is resistant to mildew and has a short production period. QA is wild and is not consumed, it is used in anti-inflammatory processes as plasters in traditional medicine23.

The Q, C and T, are characterized by having bioactive compounds recognized as antioxidants7,24,25 this activity is attributed to flavonoids, this type of compound also reported anti-ACE activity in other natural sources26, Hettihewa et al.27 & Guerrero et al.28 identified several types of flavonoids from natural sources with inhibitory activity on ECA27,28, several flavonoids reported, are also found in Q and C, the reported study confirms this activity is found in AG, such as kaempferol and quercetin found in Q29, rutin phenolic compounds, chlorogenic acid and gallic acid in Q and C30.

According to the report by Repo-Carrasco-Valencia et al.31, the flavonoid content of Q varies from 36.2 to 72.6 mg/100 g, of C from 24.2 to 41.9 mg/100 g31, in the present study, all the varieties, WRQ, BRQ, QJG, QA, QP, QK presented a flavonoid content of 63.95 to 92.86 mg/100 g, being the wild QA the one with the lowest content, from C 42.78±1.2 mg/100 g was obtained. From lupinus mutabilis (T), a recent study of 33 ecotypes obtained the total flavonoid content from 30 to 135 mg/100g32, in our study 91.2 mg/100 g was obtained.

Asao & Watanabe33 reported the anti ACE activity of the extract boiled and treated with ethanol of Q with high antioxidant activity and an ACE inhibition of 23.3 %33. Our group evaluated the PE rich in flavonoids of the 6 Q varieties that presented ACE inhibitory activity with an average of 24.3±2.4 %. The flavonoids detected in the Q are glycosylated, 4 derived from kaempferol and 2 derived from quercetin34. This characteristic of these compounds could influence the ACE inhibitory activity. In the study carried out by Ranilla et al.35 of extracts obtained by boiling Q, C, and T, in antihypertensive activity, only T presented anti-ACE activity, with an activity of 52% inhibition35, in the present study, we worked with PE, obtaining antihypertensive activity of EF of C (56.4 %) and T (54.2 %) of inhibitory activity in ACE. The flavonoid content does not correlate with the anti-ACE activity (Table 1), which gives rise to 2 options: i) flavonoid glycosylation interferes to a different degree with ACE activity, ii) there are compounds other than flavonoids that present this activity. According to Moreno-Limon & González-Luna36, the Q hydrolyzed proteins treated with ALC exhibited ACE inhibitory activity greater than 80 % with a DH of 32 %, and with FLA up to 48 % inhibition36, in the present study, the BRQ and QJG varieties exhibited 61 % inhibition, WRQ (67 %) and QA (83 %) with ALC with an average DH of 25.0±0.6, data similar to those reported, with FLA the hydrolyzed proteins of all grains presented 70 to 75 % of ACE inhibitory activity with a DH of 24.1±0.7, the proteins treated with PAN and PEP also presented a high ACE inhibitory activity as observed in Table 4, indicating the probability that peptide sequences of different sizes exist in the proteins. AG proteins with this activity, which coincides with what was reported by Alexaindre et al.3. The work of Shi et al.37 reported high inhibitory activity of Q protein hydrolysates in ACE, treated for 120 min with PEP with an IC50 of 0.78 mg/mL37. In our study, the protein hydrolyzate by PEP was for 90 min with a IC50 of 1.52±0.08 mg/mL, which indicates that the greater the hydrolysis with PEP, the greater the anti ACE activity.

The C protein hydrolysates, obtained by sequential treatment with Neutrase/ALC enzymes for 180 min at 50º C, presented an anti ACE activity of 69.8% as reported by Chirinos et al.38, our group obtained 44.3±1.1 % of inhibitory activity of the C protein hydrolyzate with the ALC treatment. In relation to the treatments with FLA, PAN and PEP our results indicate a greater or equal percentage of inhibition to the treatments with ALC.

From T, our study reports an ACE inhibitory activity greater than 50 % of the protein hydrolysates due to the enzymatic application of the 4 enzymes (ALC, FLA, PAN and PEP), as observed in Table 4.

Of the peptide fractions obtained by exclusion chromatography and bound by TLC, in the cases treated with ALC, FLA and PAN up to fraction 6 with high anti-ACE activity, even reaching 80 % of ACE inhibitory activity of WRQ, QJG, QA, C and T, similar studies indicate that peptides between 1 and 5 kDa have greater activity than those of 10 kDa36,39. From T, purified gamma-conglutin peptides have been identified that have references with ACE39 inhibitory activity. In short, peptides with this activity have been reported in other lupine species, proposing their clinical use in hypertension40.

ALC and FLA enzymes are the ones that are usually used to obtain protein hydrolysates in the determination of ACE inhibitory activity, mainly in proteins isolated from vegetable grains, cereals, and pseudocereals41,42. Our group not only worked with ALC and FLA, in addition, was also used with pepsin and pancreatin, obtaining highly significant anti-ACE activity in each case.

The WSP of FH of WRQ, QA, C, T obtained by ALC and FLA presented in all cases greater inhibitory activity (˃50 %) of ACE in relation to the WIP. The WIP presented less activity, between 24 and 28 % for the pseudocereals (WRQ, QA, C), the exception was the T that presented an activity of 52 %, however, we must consider that the protein content in the T flour was higher, so the IC50 of the WSP of T by ALC and FLA were the highest of 1.49 and 1.52 mg/mL corresponding.

A greater antihypertensive activity of HH treated with ALC of QA was confirmed (83.1% IC50 0.38 mg/mL), which correlates with the activity of protein hydrolysates (83.4 % IC50 0.68 mg/mL), considering that the protein content in the Samples of FH subjected to anti ACE activity was lower, so that greater activity of the WSP could be attributed to the presence of glycosylated phenolic compounds together with the peptides obtained by enzymatic hydrolysis.

The PE rich in flavonoid compounds, protein hydrolysates and peptide fractions of different ecotypes of Q, C (pseudocereals) and T (legumes), presented a moderate to high inhibitory activity in ACE. Protein hydrolysates, peptide fractions obtained by treatment with ALC, FLA, PAN and PEP, as well as water-soluble products of flours hydrolyzed by AMY/ALC and AMY/FLA exhibited high ACE inhibitory activity. The present work proposes to develop clinical studies and dietary strategies to control hypertension from Q, C and T hydrolysates as a natural alternative.

REFERENCES

1. Gradman AH, Kad R. Renin inhibition in hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51(5):519-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.027Links ]

2. Martínez Augustin O, Martínez de Victoria E. Proteínas y péptidos en nutrición enteral. Nutr Hosp 2006;21(Suppl 2):1-14. [ Links ]

3. Aleixandre A, Miguel M, Muguerza B. Péptidos antihipertensivos derivados de proteínas de leche y huevo. Nutr Hosp 2008;23(4):313-8. [ Links ]

4. Jacobsen SE, Mujica A, Ortiz R. La importancia de los cultivos andinos. Fermentum 2003;13(36): 14-24. [ Links ]

5. Graf BL, Rojas-Silva P, Rojo LE, Delatorre-Herrera J, Baldeón ME, Raskin I. Innovations in health value and functional food development of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2015;14(4):431-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12135Links ]

6. Repo-Carrasco R, Espinoza C, Jacobsen S. Nutritional value and use of the Andean crops quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule). Food Rev lnt 2003;19(1-2):179-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/FRI-120018884Links ]

7. Repo-Carrasco-Valencia R, Acevedo de La Cruz A, Icochea Alvarez JC, Kallio H. Chemical and functional characterization of Kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule) grain, extrudate and bran. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 2009;64(2):94-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-009-0109-0Links ]

8. Pérez GT, Steffolani ME, León AE. Cañahua: An Ancient Grain for New Foods. In: Kristbergsson K, Ötles S, editors. Functional Propiedades of Traditional Foods. Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2016. p. 119-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7662-8_9Links ]

9. Rastrelli L, De Simone F, Schettino O, Dini A. Constituents of Chenopodium pallidicaule (Cañihua) Seeds: isolation and characterization of new triterpene saponins. J Agric Food Chem 1996;44 (11):3528-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf950253pLinks ]

10. Jacobsen SE, Mujica A. El tarwi (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet.) y sus parientes silvestres. En: Moraes M, Øllgaard B, Kvist LP, Borchsenius F, Balslev H, editores. Botánica Económica de los Andes Centrales [Internet]. La Paz: Universidad Mayor de San Andrés; 2006: p. 458-82. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Monica-Moraes-R/publication/312313242_Botanica_Economica_de_los_Andes_Centrales/links/587988a408ae9a860fe2f2ad/Botanica-Economica-de-los-Andes-Centrales.pdf#page=474 [ Links ]

11. Ortega-David E, Rodríguez A, David A, Zamora-Burbano Á. Caracterización de semillas de lupino (Lupinus mutabilis) sembrado en los Andes de Colombia. Acta Agron 2010;59(1):111-8. [ Links ]

12. Wang W, De Mejia EG. A New frontier in soy bioactive peptides that may prevent age-related chronic diseases. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2005;4(4):63-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2005.tb00075.xLinks ]

13. Seppo L, Jauhiainen T, Poussa T, Korpela R. A fermented milk high in bioactive peptides has a blood pressure-lowering effect in hypertensive subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77(2):326-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/77.2.326Links ]

14. Bonifacio A, Vargas A, Mamani M. Uso de variedades de quinua y semilla de calidad. En: Fundación PROINPA, editores. Informe Compendio 2011-2014 [Internet]. Cochabamba: Fundación PROINPA; 2015. p. 33-43. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.proinpa.org/publico/Informe_compendio_2011_2014/variedades%20de%20quinua.pdf [ Links ]

15. Chang CC, Yang MH, Wen HM, Chern JC. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colometric methods. J Food Drug Anal 2002;10(3):178-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.2748Links ]

16. Latimer GW, editor. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International [Internet]. Rockville: AOAC International; 2016 [cited 22 October 2022]. 34 p. Retrieved from: https://www.techstreet.com/standards/official-methods-of-analysis-of-aoac-international-20th-edition-2016?product_id=1937367Links ]

17. NEOGEN Corporation. Total Starch (α-Amylase/Amyloglucosidse) Assay Protocol [Internet]. Lansing: NEOGEN Corporation; 2022 [cited 22 July 2022]. 24 p. Retrieved from: https://www.megazyme.com/documents/Assay_Protocol/K-TSTA-100A_DATA.pdf [ Links ]

18. Spellman D, McEvoy E, O&apos;cuinn G, FitzGerald RJ. Proteinase and exopeptidase hydrolysis of whey protein: Comparison of the TNBS, OPA and pH stat methods for quantification of degree of hydrolysis. Int Dairy J 2003;13(6):447-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(03)00053-0Links ]

19. Navia-Coarite NA, Nina-Mollisaca GL, Mena-Gallardo EP, Salcedo-Ortiz L. Hidrólisis enzimática en harina de quinua y tarwi por efecto de a-Amilasa. Rev Bio Agro 2019;17(1):64-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18684/bsaa.v17n1.1205Links ]

20. Parris N, Moreau RA, Johnston DB, Dickey LC, Aluko RE. Angiotensin I converting enzyme-inhibitory peptides from commercial wet- and dry-milled corn germ. J Agric Food Chem 2008;56(8): 2620-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf072238dLinks ]

21. Cú-Cañetas T, Betancur Ancona D, Gallegos Tintoré S, Sandoval Peraza M, Chel Guerrero L. Estudios de inhibición in vitro de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina-I, efectos hipotensor y antihipertensivo de fracciones peptídicas de V. unguiculata. Nutr Hosp 2015;32(5):2117-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2015.32.5.9624Links ]

22. Arancibia-Radich J, Peña-Cerda M, Jara D, Valenzuela-Bustamante P, Goity L, Valenzuela-Barra G, et al. Comparative study of anti-inflammatory activity and qualitative-quantitative composition of triterpenoids from ten genotypes of Ugni molinae. Bol Latinoam Caribe Plantas Med Aromát 2016;15(5):274-87. [ Links ]

23. Mora A, Zapata Ferrufino B, Hunter D, Navarro G, Galeano G, Apaza KS, et al. Especies de la familia Chenopodiaceae Género Chenopodium. En: Mora A, Zapata Ferrufino B, Hunter D, Navarro G, Galeano G, Apaza KS, et al., editores. Libro Rojo de parientes silvestres de cultivos de Bolivia [Internet]. La Paz: VMABCC-Bioversity International; 2009. p. 131-4. Recuperado a partir de: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/files/2015/02/1.1-libro-rojo-parientes-silvestres-de-cultivos_mmaya_2009.pdf [ Links ]

24. Miranda M, Vega-Gálvez A, Uribe E, López J, Martínez E, Rodríguez MJ, et al. Physico-chemical analysis, antioxidant capacity and vitamins of six ecotypes of chilean quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Procedia Food Sci 2011;1:1439-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2011.09.213Links ]

25. Manrique K, Intiquilla A, Palma-Albino C, Jiménez-Aliaga K, Zavaleta AI, Izaguirre V, et al. Actividad antioxidante e inhibición de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina I (ECA I) de hidrolizados proteicos de Lupinus mutabilis (Tarwi). En: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, editor. Seminario Internacional en Biotecnología para la Salud. Libro de resúmenes: 4, 5 y 6 de marzo de 2020. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos [Internet]. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos; 2020 [citado 3 de enero de 2023]. p. 86-7. Recuperado a partir de: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/238341 [ Links ]

26. Das S, De B. Evaluation of Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitory potential of some underutilized indigenous fruits of West Bengal using an in vitro model. Fruits 2013;68(6):499-506.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2013092Links ]

27. Hettihewa SK, Hemar Y, Rupasinghe HPV. Flavonoid-Rich extract of Actinidia macrosperma (A Wild Kiwifruit) inhibits Angiotensin-Converting enzyme in vitro. Foods 2018;7(9):146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7090146Links ]

28. Guerrero L, Castillo J, Quiñones M, Garcia-Vallvé S, Arola L, Pujadas G, et al. Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme activity by flavonoids: structure-activity relationship studies. PLoS One 2012;7(11):e49493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049493Links ]

29. Lee MJ, Sim KH. Nutritional value and the kaempferol and quercetin contents of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) from different regions. Korean J Food Sci Technol 2018;50(6): 680-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2018.50.6.680Links ]

30. Coronado-Olano J, Repo-Carrasco-Valencia R, Reategui O, Toscano E, Valdez E, Zimic M, et al. Inhibitory activity against a-amylase and a-glucosidase by phenolic compounds of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and cañihua (Chenopodium pallidicaule Aellen) from the Andean region of Peru. Pharmacog J 2021;13(4): 896-901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5530/pj.2021.13.115Links ]

31. Repo-Carrasco-Valencia R, Hellström JK, Pihlava J, Mattila PH. Flavonoids and other phenolic compounds in Andean indigenous grains: Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa), kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule) and kiwicha (Amaranthus caudatus). Food Chem 2010;120(1):128-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.09.087Links ]

32. Estivi L, Grassi S, Briceño-Berrú L, Glorio-Paulet P, Camarena F, Hidalgo A, et al. Free phenolic compounds, antioxidant capacity and FT-NIR survey of debittered Lupinus mutabilis seeds. Processes 2022;10(8):1637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10081637Links ]

33. Asao M, Watanabe K. Functional and bioactive properties of quinoa and amaranth. Food Sci Technol Res 2010;16(2):163-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3136/fstr.16.163Links ]

34. Zhu N, Sheng S, Li D, Lavoie EJ, Karwe MV, Rosen RT, et al. Antioxidative flavonoid glycosides from quinoa seed (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). J Food Lipids 2001;8(1):37-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4522.2001.tb00182.xLinks ]

35. Ranilla LG, Apostolidis E, Genovese MI, Lajolo FM, Shetty K. Evaluation of indigenous grains from the Peruvian Andean region for antidiabetes and antihypertension potential using in vitro methods. J Med Food 2009;12(4):704-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2008.0122Links ]

36. Moreno-Limón S, González-Luna R. Antihyper-tensive activity of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) protein hydrolysates. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med 2018;15(4):22-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21010/ajtcam.v15i4.3Links ]

37. Shi Z, Hao Y, Teng C, Yao Y, Ren G. Functional properties and adipogenesis inhibitory activity of protein hydrolysates from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Food Sci Nutr 2019;7(6):2103-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1052Links ]

38. Chirinos R, Ochoa K, Aguilar-Gálvez A, Carpentier S, Pedreschi R, Campos D. Obtaining of peptides with in vitro antioxidant and angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitory activities from cañihua protein (Chenopodium pallidicaule Aellen). J Cereal Sci 2018;83:139-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2018.07.004Links ]

39. Muñoz EB, Luna-Vital DA, Fornasini M, Baldeón ME, Gonzalez de Mejia E. Gamma-conglutin peptides from Andean lupin legume (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet) enhanced glucose uptake and reduced gluconeogenesis in vitro. J Funct Foods 2018;45: 339-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2018.04.021Links ]

40. Boschin G, Scigliuolo GM, Resta D, Arnoldi A. Optimization of the enzymatic hydrolysis of lupin (Lupinus) proteins for producing ACE-Inhibitory peptides. J Agric Food Chem 2014;62(8):1846-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf4039056Links ]

41. Ambigaipalan P, Al-Khalifa AS, Shahidi F. Antioxidant and angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activities of date seed protein hydrolysates prepared using Alcalase, Flavour-zyme and Thermolysin. J Funct Foods 2015;18(Pt B):1125-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.01.021Links ]

42. Ahn C-B, Jeon Y-J, Kim Y-T, Je J-Y. Angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides from salmon byproduct protein hydrolysate by Alcalase hydrolysis. Process Biochem 2012;47 (12): 2240-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2012.08.019Links ]

Funding source Within the framework of the projects "Design of the technological process for the pilot production of nutritional additives from quinoa, La Paz-Bolivia", "Development of products for renal deficiency from Andean grains, La Paz Bolivia ", "Functional qualities of cañahua", financed by funds Direct Tax on Hydrocarbons.

Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgements We thank the Umala Jurisdiction Quinoa Producers Association (ASPROQUIJUA), the food company IRUPANA S.A., the Patacamaya-UMSA Agronomy Academic Unit, for the provision and specific identification of the varieties of quinoa, cañahua and Tarwi. To the IDH/ASDI projects "Design of the technological process for the pilot production of nutritional additives from quinoa, La Paz-Bolivia"; "Development of products for renal deficiency from Andean grains, La Paz Bolivia"; "Functional qualities of cañahua", to the Universidad Mayor de San Andrés for the support

Ethical considerations The present work was carried out in vitro, the research did not involve living beings (humans and animals), therefore it is not subject to an ethical analysis.

Research limitations The time established for the completion of the project is a limitation that was presented, however the common work by the members helped a lot to meet the goals and objectives.

Authors' contribution to the article The authors Gigliola Ormachea Peggy Brenda and Salcedo Ortiz Lily, carried out the conception and design of the study. Nina Mollisaca Gastón Luis, Navia Coarite Nancy Alejandra and Mena Gallardo Evelin Paty, carried out the data collection and the study of the techniques used. Hurtado Ulloa Rosember, carried out the statistics and interpretation of data. The approval of the final version to be published was approved by all the authors, which is ratified with the letter of originality.

ID of article: 163/JSARS/2022

Editor's Note: Journal of the Selva Andina Research Society (JSARS) remains neutral with respect to jurisdictional claims published on maps and institutional affiliations, and all statements expressed in this article are those of the authors alone, and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, editors and reviewers. Any products that may be evaluated in this article or claims that may be made by their manufacturer are neither guaranteed nor endorsed by the publisher.

Received: September 01, 2022; Revised: November 01, 2022; Accepted: March 01, 2023

*Dirección de contacto: Universidad Mayor de San Andrés. Institute of Chemical Research. Bio-organic Laboratory. University Campus of Cota Cota. Building of the Faculty of Pure and Natural Sciences. Calle Andrés Bello c. 27 s/n, CP 303. La Paz, Plurinational State of Bolivia. Peggy Brenda Gigliola-Ormachea E-mail address: peggybrenda16@gmail.com

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons