SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.3 issue2Genetic variability of the germplasm collection Cañihua (Chenopodium pallidicaule Aellen) of BoliviaIsaño (Tropaeolum tuberosum) a traditional alimentary and medicinal crop in Huatacana, for the benefit of the bolivian population. author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista de Investigación e Innovación Agropecuaria y de Recursos Naturales

Print version ISSN 2409-1618

Abstract

COARITE, Mario et al. Grain loss of Cañahua before and after physiological maturity (Chenopodium pallidicaule Aellen). RIIARn [online]. 2016, vol.3, n.2, pp.134-145. ISSN 2409-1618.

Cañahua is considered important in the diet, compared to other Andean crops and products that Bolivia produces; besides it offers characteristics of great value, such us tolerance to low temperatures and above all that the grains are saponin-free. However, its main problem during the production is the loss of grains, which shows that it is a species in process of domestication. This research was conducted in Villa Patarani Community. Loss of grains per plant was determined before physiological maturity (pre-harvest) using collectors and/or traps for collecting fallen grains. Also grain loss during harvest (after physiological maturity) was determined and compared between three harvest methods: hand picking, sickle and pruning shears, and between six cultivars sowed in two different dates. Before physiological maturity, the date of sowing influenced the loss of grains. The loss of grains was greater in the first date (2.91%) than in the second (1.36%). Regarding harvesting methods, the method of picking had greater grain loss (2.60%), followed by the sickle method (1.67%) and the harvest with pruning shears (1.53%) which was the method with lowest loss of grains. Despite this last result, this method is not widely used by producers. During harvest, the cultivars Illimani and Kullaca showed higher grain losses (2.31 and 2.17%), whereas Umacutama cultivar showed lower losses (1.96%). During harvest, the cultivars Illimani and Kullaca had higher grain losses of 2.31 and 2.17%, while in Umacutama the loss was lower (1.96%).

Keywords : Cañahua; grain loss; food security; Center Altiplano.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License