SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número19La regulación de la nulidad procesal en el nuevo código procesal boliviano: un análisis a partir de cuatro cuestionesEl homeschooling a debate: ¿una hipótesis de responsabilidad paterna? índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Iuris Tantum Revista Boliviana de Derecho

versión impresa ISSN 2070-8157

Resumen

ANDALUZ VEGACENTENO, Horacio. Argumentation, arbitration and arbitrariness: the contradictions of the constitutional tribunal in the direct recourse of nullity against awards. Rev. Bol. Der. [online]. 2015, n.19, pp. 90-117. ISSN 2070-8157.

This article analyzes a ruling of the Bolivian Constitutional Tribunal from the point of view of the argumentation of the court rulings. In the ruling, the Tribunal stated that the request for contractual nullity was not a matter of arbitration.This article is not focused on the grounds of this assertion, but on its implications with respect to the precedents of same Constitutional Tribunal. In this regard, the article concludes that, to hand down the ruling in question,theTribunal violated its own precedents for the direct recourse of nullity (which is the specific recourse that resulted in said ruling) about the legality of submitting requests for contractual nullity to arbitration and regarding the judicial production of the law. Since this ruling is contrary to its own precedents, it is an arbitrary ruling, giving rise to this article.

Palabras clave : Arbitration; judicial motivation; public order; contractual nullity.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License